There is not right to view porn. Maybe making it, yes. Although SCOTUS has notably never defined obscenity in terms of porn. And that is as drastic oversimplification of the Ashcroft case.

???

Porn is protected speech?

Sure but I’m asking if, in the most famous gay street in the US, there are bars that are not “gay bars”

Laws are stupid because people break them

Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1

Are there non-gay bars on Castro st? Never been to SF but all I know is that’s like the most iconic/historic gay district

.world has way more traffic than anyone else. I assume that’s why you’re seeing “Chevy Vega” issues

Hello one of the oldest and most trusted Lemmy users, can I bribe you to use another platform with the world’s sketchiest link?

I mean, how many rules are we expected to read?!

Oh, it’s the first rule?

A good article isn’t made better by posting it 3 times

I know I’m a shitty person but being able to get over the $25 same day delivery threshold by ordering a few bottles of $2.50 GTS kombucha was pretty dope. Gonna miss my local Amazon Fresh that I’ve only been to once

“Oh shit, Zelensky, we both threw rock. This is the craziest game of rock, paper scissors that I’ve ever played!”

Just thought it could use a caption

It doesn’t sound like they are saying the are going to block sideloading, just sideloading stuff like Kodi that are often used for illegal streaming

This was my immediate guess. Not even obtuse terms, just not wanting kids to stumble on torture porn and snuff films

It’s typical for tech companies to organize as nonprofits and then restructure because they are losing cash?

Not sure if I’m misunderstanding you or what part you think is typical

This is what companies that actually care about privacy do. People over profits

Edit: actually, I’m not quite that naive, there’s certainly a business motive here. Cut the dead weight before it drags you down. Still, a good move nonetheless

On one hand, this was posted 15 minutes before you posted this… on the other hand, this is a much clearer headline

This has happened a couple times in the UK. It’s a lot different than the USA for a few reasons, one being the NHS isn’t gonna waste money on someone who has like a .0001% chance of recovery (and why should they?).