My first reaction was “who give a fuck?” then I got to the part of the article that says:

His website, which also features the purple dragon and a bunch of busted links in the footer, says that the firm “integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services.”

Which is honestly a thousand times more concerning than how he chooses to display his silly logo. Dude is writing legal documents with AI. At least his lack of professionalism is obvious.

Honestly that big ass logo is distracting.
Regardless of the design, any logo set at that level of transparency, size and placement, is going to make the text hard to read.

How else am I supposed to waste color toner so I can overbill my clients?

I’m genuinely surprised that corporations haven’t started sponsoring defendants through watermarking their company logos on legal briefings.

phew, I dodged this one. My logo is just a purple dragon with no suit

I would not mind if they toned it down to what other people do for a watermark. As in: if you really look for it, it is noticeable, but it does not obstruct actual contents, or makes it harder to read.

And if they don’t want it to be copied or scanned, just drop in a few Eurions.