

That’s because only one interface is really being used. A TCP session will reset if the hop count or metric changes all the time, the SYN/ACK wouldn’t work.


That’s because only one interface is really being used. A TCP session will reset if the hop count or metric changes all the time, the SYN/ACK wouldn’t work.


Oh, you are failing one over if the other fails? That’s not the same thing as configuring two interfaces with the same IP, gateway, at the same time, which is what I thought you were trying to do.


Is it possible to configure interfaces this way? Yes.
Will it work? No, not without bonding, and not with WiFi as one of the interfaces.
The author says that Linux should be as usable for grandparents as it is for children
My problem with this statement constantly bombarded on us is that it assumes that someone somewhere out there who cares.
To me, it seems that is the actual deciding factor in sticking with Linux… Realizing that if you want something that doesn’t exist, you’ll have to make it.


These tools need to be studied, trained for, and applied purposely in order to be most effective.
No shit, welcome to 2021, sir.
Not sure what kind of engagement you want, this is the easy and obvious part. The real hard question is what we’re going to do about it. I don’t think anyone disagrees with this, we were all saying it in 2018.


Remember all those american movies where a foreign national goes “hey, america! John Wayne!”?
Us westerners are all going to be that: “hey, chine! Jackie Chan!”


Btrfs and ZFS do online defrag
News to me for ZFS. Are you talking about the recently implemented rewrite? Because “defrag” isnt really what that does, it simply consolidates metaslab data to (possibly) free up low-use blocks.
Using ZFS fragmentation profile import/export and/or enabling dynamic gang headers can certainly help with high fragmentation.


From my perspective
Are you aware that I don’t have your perspective?
I wanted to know more about your project, from your own words. Instead I got a lecture about how “dumb” I am, so I’m no longer interested, because you seem like a jerk. Whether that was intensional or is coming from an ill-adapted social outlook, I’m still not sure of.
You seem to care more about being correct than talking about your project, which is your choice, I suppose.
I’d close this with a glib sign-off like “have a nice day”, but I’m not sure having a nice day is within your array of skills.


With any luck, you get an octarine cloud of smoke and death appears.
You can get creative with Linux.
Regarding alpine, be prepared to find differences from glibc and systemd distros in places you don’t expect. PHP (god forbid you should need it) is a right mess on alpine. Mongodb will not work on alpine. Stuff like that.
I may take some challenge on this, but the tcpip stack seems faster on alpine than in debian, at least in my use cases.


It’s not that obvious on Voyager, but hey, thanks for being passive aggressive about it.


You gonna tell us what we’re looking at here?


She’s so corrupt and clearly a separatist Premier.
She’s even more corrupt than separatists, because we all know she’d turn on them to save her own skin in a heartbeat.


Hey, I’m 50 and I’ll burn down a data center or two.


But the field can contain anything at all, so if anonymity is the goal, you can still have that.
This dialog isn’t asking for a legal name, it’s just suggesting using your real name because that’s a pretty normal thing.


It’s always been thus, tho, I think?
Seems like our times are troubled enough that identity is become a powderkeg issue, which I can understand.
But I don’t think Debian is forcing us to inscribe our legal names here.


I don’t get it.
The EU made your life easier with USBC for everything, I don’t think you’re paying more for the privilege.