- 70 Posts
- 17 Comments
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•US Senator moves to file Section 230 repeal
2·1 month agoObviously the way the previous commenter worded it would infringe on the platforms’ free speech, it’s only workable if we replace “harmful” with “illegal” (e.g. libelous).
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?
4·2 months agoThe law will be the same in all EU countries, including whichever parts you think will be “not mandatory” (I did read those news articles and am fully aware that mandatory scanning is no longer on the table).
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?
971·2 months agomisleading headline, this isn’t a list of countries in which the law will (if it passes) be different (it won’t be, it’s an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries), it’s a list of countries that currently support/oppose the law
likely not either (much) better or worse than any other place where you store your files unencrypted on someone else’s computer?
Not sure what exactly you’re asking.
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•EU Commission about to wreck core principles of the GDPR
33·3 months agoReforming the GDPR is in principle a good idea because many of the terms used in it are so vague that it’s completely unclear what it does or doesn’t mean.
Somehow I suspect that improving this isn’t what’s going to happen…
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOPto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Half-good new Danish Chat Control proposalEnglish
4·3 months agoThe idea is that privacy laws in the EU arguably normally make it illegal for messaging providers to even voluntarily scan messages for illegal activity (including child pornography). What’s being proposed is an exemption to that so that they can scan voluntarily.
That is no longer in the realm of governments trying to oppress us, we are now talking about business regulation. It would not prohibit anyone from running their own messaging server or running any software on their own device.
In any case, the IPA above doesn’t seem “unpronounceable” at all to me as a native speaker of German and fluent speaker of English. The pronunciation isn’t intuitive from the spelling, that is quite a different thing from being unpronounceable.
I don’t use one except for work (to connect to corporate networks).
A VPN mostly changes which entity you have to trust (from your ISP to your VPN provider). I don’t have a reason to distrust my ISP any more than any VPN provider. I don’t have any need to regularly get around any geoblocking.
When I do privacy-sensitive things, I use Tor, which is actually effective at hiding who I am and what I am doing.
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Concerned message from CEO of Telegram about privacy and censorship
6·4 months agoDo you have a link to a source for this?
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOPto
Privacy@lemmy.world•One-man spam campaign ravages EU ‘chat control’ billEnglish
11·4 months agoto be clear, I obviously think the campaign against chat control is a very good and very necessary thing; I shared the article because I found the campaign methods interesting and also wanted to draw more attention to what’s going on, not because I agree with all of its framing (although I understood the “spam” in the headline to be tongue-in-cheek, maybe not everyone did though?).
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOPto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Chat Control is "like a malware on your device" – Signal slams the EU proposal to scan your private chatsEnglish
4·4 months agowhich is not end-to-end encrypted either
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Lemmy should allow users to post using Tor but block links and imagesEnglish
1·4 months agoI remember reading a post somewhere on the threadiverse that contained a list of all websites one AI crawler was using for training, there were several Lemmy instances on it. It would even be possible to set up an instance only to crawl it.
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Lemmy should allow users to post using Tor but block links and imagesEnglish
7·4 months agoYou might want to post something publicly, but conceal who you are. Tor can help with that.
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Lemmy should allow users to post using Tor but block links and imagesEnglish
4·4 months agoMuch of AI training happens on the entire public web, including here.
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Scottish Government bans use of WhatsApp for official businessEnglish
1·1 year agoWhy was it previously allowed, one may ask.













This is from 2021, why post this now…?