Edit about the 4chan image blocking, I asked Rimu directly:

I wrote a long message about how that checkbox only notifies about federated posts.

So the difference is for local posts it blocks the creation of the post entirely, but for federated posts it just notifies the admin.

https://chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/3-general/topic//near/10529

– Original message:

https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/src/commit/b168820a089ff6e835059f0d806f81b612987a79/app/models.py#L3513

A few people in the other thread assumed that it was required to fork the code to disable those filters. That’s not the case, the filters can be configured, and are off by default.

To hide the reputation system, here’s a line of CSS that admins can add in the admin area to hide it for every user

https://piefed.social/c/piefed_css/p/1722358/hide-red-triangle-warnings-on-accounts-with-bad-reputation

That CSS line can also be used by any user wanting to hide the score at the user level.

  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Wasn’t the biggest concern and question why it didn’t do an actual error message and is there any notes to say the performance impact having the 4chan filter on?

    I’d also argue

    To hide the reputation system, here’s a line of CSS that admins can add in the admin area to hide it for every user

    Does absolutely nothing to assure people concerned about it being a thing. Like hiding it doesn’t do anything about it being a thing

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Those checkboxes have been there since version 0.9. Ages.

    The problem with grabbing small snippets of code is a lot of context is lost. Don’t trust anyone who does that. PieFed has 50,000 lines of code so anyone showing you 50 lines is leaving out 99.9% of the picture.

    As I said a month ago, anyone with honest questions about how things work who wants to make PieFed better knows where to find us. You don’t have to be a coder, we need translators, designers, documentation writers, bug reporters, community evangelists and all that.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Clean, simple code that is easy to understand and contribute to

      The problem with grabbing small snippets of code is a lot of context is lost. Don’t trust anyone who does that. PieFed has 50,000 lines of code so anyone showing you 50 lines is leaving out 99.9% of the picture.

      These 2 statements are incompatible.

      Plus depending on the snippets they definitely can tell how things work

      • wjs018@piefed.wjs018.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Previous threads about these filters were people complaining about them being hardcoded, completely ignoring that they are completely optional and off by default. It would go something like this:


        Look at this awful thing PieFed does!

        def do_the_thing():
            # relatively simple code that does the thing
        

        It completely ignored the context that the do_the_thing function is only called if the admin wants to do the thing.

    • seawoowaes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      get back to work hardcoding censorship and pushing your tankie ideology in your code.

      What is wrong with you? Why would you put malicious code into piefed that deliberately misleads users?