Sure, I know a lot of projects have been on GH since before MS bought it, but they’ve owned it for quite a while now, so we really should be seeing better migration out by now, no?

Codeberg is nonprofit which seems more in the spirit of the Linux ecosystem overall. GH is for-profit…

  • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    If you just want one point of truth, the minimal version is to create a bare repo somewhere that you have ssh access to or your local machine. Then you can clone/pull/push from it.

    A bare repo is a special kind of repo meant for exactly this, but can be a bit confusing at first. A normal repo contains all of your current working files and a special .git directory that holds all the files/blobs/history that git needs to work. A bare repo is just the .git as a top directory with bare=true in its config. So you can use it as a remote, but it never has a working set. They are usually named something like my_repo.git.

    Edit:

    Here’s a basic example for setting it all up in a fully local way:

    mkdir ~/bares  
    git init --bare ~/bares/my_repo.git  
    mkdir ~/code  
    git clone ~/bares/my_repo.git ~/code/my_repo  
    

    And then you have remotes as your main source of truth in ~/bares and your working copies in ~/code. If you want to access from another machine that has ssh access to the first, you can do:

    mkdir ~/code  
    git clone user@host:~/bares/my_repo.git ~/code/my_repo  
    

    And then use git pull/push to keep it all in sync. Don’t use Syncthing on a git repo, it eventually goes badly.