Heiliger Strohsack

The first one I registred back then was uncreative yet convenient: My full legal name. I like to advise almost anyone to do so.

For all the places where you do not need or want to reveal your identity you can use something harmless website3001 (or just any random number)

I am not that much into tech, but that reads like this being more of a gimmick and a niche. It is great to be able to adapt technology to ones need, but this seems to be something that average users do not think of and is far beyond detailed customization.

That said I think getting infantilised by the manufacturer or vendor, however, is annoying. In contrast curiosity and play instinct can be fun. Having fun is possbible even by being sufficient. I watch older television series, play older games, read older books. I have so much to experience without a subscription to streaming service, buying the newest gaming consoles or computing with the newest devices.

I am not entirely sure if we talk about persistent or volatile memory here (english is not my first language, if its persistent the term storage fits better).

What I do not get is why there is a need for more in the first place? What makes waydroid so “hungry”?

I do not pledge for stagnation, but as progress comes with a price, I do see no need to run forward, hustling even. Instead of going slower and catch up with the people who do not even have internet access nowadays, but want it. Or the ones who are using stuff thats too slow or small for others. Lets try to align access and usage of technology worldwide. Everybody deservers progress and the experience of the advantages technology is offering.

i would want them to produce phones with the best hardware possible as fast as possible.

Why? For what? Ongoing tech “improvements” like this are irresponsible nowadays. As of today we aleady accomplished much progress as humans, but the need to pause, rest, recover urgently is constantly challenged.

Let us break the cycle and finally become sufficient. Especially but not exclusively within consumer electronics.

if spare parts are continued to be offered existing owners lose nothing?

We lose finite resources, the ones of the world and our own. Including spare time. We exchange it for a distraction from reality in 8K and labor that just powers the hamster wheels which probably most of the people didnt want to enter.

This triggers me. I mean, it’s a nice proof of concept and a small skit for the rest of the industry by regularly announce and show that it is possible to produce repairable and somehow better smartphones. It’s like selling organic fruit and vegetables on the local farmers market and attract “conscious” folks that are already trying not to buy food from the grocery store.

Do they think their project, their vision and business model will loose the relatively small attention from a broader range of (possible) costumers if they just pause and use more capacities to support the devices already on the market? Do they fear cuts in their supply chain, because its difficult to re-establish it once the people producing for/with them turn away and work for others?

With the right to repair and othe regulations their (former?) unique features will become a obstactle to persist in the market in which others, the mainstream manufacturers, are getting stronger.

I do not need a new smatphone every two years, not even a somehow fair one. Just produce spare parts for all your models and release everything related as open source, making it possible to run even longer with new(est) android versions or just Linux.

By let them use this building, the state respresented by the local administration has the legal task to supervise almost anything the laws and regulations specify, like safety regulations in case of a fire, maintenance activities and so on.

Also law enforcement and intelligence are probably happier to watch and observe whatever the people actually (plan to) do in a (more) “easy mode”. Even if its getting used for distraction and/or propaganda by the russian officials it may deliver some evidence for acutal threats of which some are unlikely to find in the whole wide world with almost unlimited possibilities.

This seems to be purely symbolic to me. Russian officials and their allies (could) do bad things not just this in this particular building. I mean they have embassies around the continent and dummies/third parties could buy, rent or operative any kind of facility.

So we express or preference(s), but I assume the executives of the ECB or another institution will have the final say.

I agree, but some buildings may be copyright-protected, no?