AwesomeLowlander

Nobody’s passing sentence, it’s just speculation about guilty parties. Last I checked that was legal and in fact common discussion.

Would you like to name other likely suspects? It’s not standard criminals, there have been no ransom demands. And they’re unlikely to piss off the govt to this extent. Which leaves state actors. Gee, wonder who it might be.

I wasn’t referring to the US in particular, but global birth rates.

https://www.science.org/content/article/population-tipping-point-could-arrive-2030

Edit to add: I’m in no way commenting on the situation in the States, just clearing up a potential misconception I see very frequently, which is that the global population is still booming, when we should already be worrying about the opposite.

misinformation about declining birth rates

What misinformation? Every expert on the subject is agreeing that we’re at or below replacement rate.

Or do they require a collateral fee when renting?

Yes

Yeah, it’s one of those things that would be nice if it weren’t for all those pesky malicious parties

Are we still talking about nuclear?

https://www.epa.gov/superfund/what-superfund

How would you implement the app in its current concept, without the possibility for abuse? It seems inherent to the very idea of it.

Regardless of the actual truth of that information.

It got bombed together with the twin towers.

Well for starters, one of the students might ask about occult rituals, then get all shocked when ChatGPT answers the question.

the women using the app basically say that the potential safety in dating outweighs the potential for abuse.

Of course they do, they’re getting safety and somebody else is getting abuse.

If that were the case, the exec needs to be fired, because this is an obvious shit storm waiting to blow in from the opposite direction

What WOULD you consider evidence of them not having backdoors, then?

I’m not claiming they don’t. I’m pointing out the absurdity of calling somebody out for not doing the impossible.

That’s because it’s categorically impossible to prove a negative.

It’s not ‘lying’ when they don’t know the truth to begin with. They could be trying to answer accurately and it’d still be dangerous misinformation.