At least in the US, this is pretty ridiculous. We have more murder tools (AKA guns) than people. And considering the majority of them are loaded and unsecured, we obviously don’t care about safety and more guns isn’t something we seem to mind so…
I think we can just print whatever the fuck we want on our 3D printers. The manufacturers of guns can seriously fuck off with this garbage legislation hidden under the guise of safety.
The surest way to peace is to round up Trump and all his cabinet and deliver them to Iran with an apology note and a promise that it will never happen again.
They can deal with punishing Trump, Vance, Miller, etc.
This is the only way forward that will begin to heal the world from the damages the US has caused.
I call it the Throw The Fuckers Under The Bus solution and if it doesn’t work. Well, at least we don’t have to look at these dumb fucks that created this most recent shit show to begin with.
Absolutely ridiculous. Try to hold war criminals accountable and we will ruin your life.
I suppose the US has to be aggressive when all their leaders are complicit with the mass murder of civilians.
Why shouldn’t we use biometrics for security?
Because you can’t change them once they are compromised. It breaks so many rules for security it isn’t funny.
Why are companies/government pushing for this?
It is not about security, it is about tracking. This is the opposite of security and if we continue to allow it we will have severe consequences in our future.
My block blocks your block blockity block block.
Perhaps they are under the misconception that we are legally obligated to defend them. This is incorrect of course.
On a side note, the US did violate this agreement when Trump threatened to withdraw support unless Ukraine agreed to blackmail Biden. Why Trump is allowed to continue to harass Ukraine is yet another failure of Congress.
Yes, that was the agreement that Russia, UK, and the US agreed to. That they would not as a country infringe on Ukraine’s sovereignty.
The guarantee is a permanent protection from their actions, not permanent protection from others action or a requirement for assistance. You are either purposely being obtuse here or just disingenuous.
My guess is you are a Russian apologist.
Both the US and Russia agreed to respect their sovereignty which Russia violated beginning in 2014 and Trump personally in 2019. While it did not spell out permanent protection, I think this is a valid interpretation in regards to permanent protection from their actions.
Another lie at the altar of protecting children. They could give a fucking rip about kids, dimmest timeline ever.
They have an entirely different use case.
No it was photography.
William S. Burroughs called photography “obscene and sinister”, while many 19th-century critics dismissed it as a “mechanical” activity lacking soul or a refuge for “failed painters”
Edvard Munch Dismissed the medium by stating, “The camera will never compete with the brush and palette until such time as photography can be taken to Heaven or Hell”.
Susan Sontag described photography as “soft murder” and a form of voyeurism, asserting it turns people into possessed objects.
And lastly
“This industry, by invading the territory of art, has become art’s most mortal enemy.” - Quote from 1859 about photography.
Strange, as the above quote sure sounds like it is about AI.
Because the whole world is fascist and the leaders of fascism don’t like to be called it, so no mainstream media or news will call it such.
Also it can be confusing for some people. For instance, in WWII the fascist USA helped Russia defeat the fascist Nazi doesn’t have the same ring to it.
Most operate like Fascism = Bad instead of Fascism = Corporatism.
Unbrexit
Absolutely bizarre thing to say. The first liberation of women in the US was 1837 when women were allowed to control their own property. The second big liberation was securing the right to vote in 1920.
The issue with what you say is how women were treated after the “boys” came home. As other responses pointed out Women have always worked. The change was the type of work.
They were forced out of their new roles. This was not liberating at all. In fact, it was quite the opposite know your place kind of adjustment.
I suppose you could make an argument that this created an eventual backlash where the first women won the right to equal pay in 1961-2.
You have a point about more women working after this time, but it was not equal as they were forced into “pink” color jobs. I would argue the war really lead to more exploitation of women.
Hitler’s murder crusade inadvertently lead to women being exploited even more than they were before by US capitalism. I suppose it did prove that women could do the job of men, even if their society didn’t respect them.
They are horribly chauvinistic.
Let’s play a game. The US elected Obama so they are not racist riiight?
Cool, now we can add global extortion to cryptocurrency benefits.
Cool, now other countries can steal China’s IP and thus the circle of knowledge continues on.
Horrible for children but good for adults. Who are we kidding.
This is a story told to us. The reality is religion has very little bearing on geopolitics, genocide and modern warfare. It is often used to demonize a group (think Muslim terrorists) and to rally people to a side without questioning why.
Religion isn’t the cause, it is just another convenient excuse.