

Not sure what you are trying to say here. AI itself is an equation.
Not sure what you are trying to say here. AI itself is an equation.
AI voices are not trained on books.
The ethical issue there is more around cloning celebrities
How does it show? (Asking for red flags, not to create an argument).
A corporate marketers imagination. Yes.
I’m not sure that wish will every be granted. You need some sort of specific software to get the hardware communicating.
I want an open source version of this https://www.evenrealities.com/
Totally. I’d also love to train a LLM on my own personal data and preferences, but there is no way I’m trusting a corporation that information.
This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me.
It’s a mobile phone you don’t need to hold.
It’s a mobile phone that never goes in your pocket.
It’s a mobile phone that is always on and has access to everything you see and hear.
Just posting on r/showerthoughts is hard enough.
Typing and tapping would soon be passé,
The tech certainly isn’t ready for this. My voice input to chatgpt gets automatically translated into Welsh.
I asked chatGPT about a quote from Iain Banks - The Player of Games. It claims not to know about it’s contents except for the cover blurb. Bullshit.
I fed it a detail and it suddenly remembered.
They must have programmed chatgpt to deny that it has read copyright works.
Deepseek had no such qualms. It couldn’t give an exact quote but it did give what it called an approximation.
Censoring communications is 1984, not Idiocracy.
You can prise my windscreen from my cold dead hands.
There would have been many other runs before the release version.
In this case the AI voices are reading the exact copyrighted material so the original author or rights holder must be contacted to secure the necessary rights and licensing agreements. There is no free use argument.
Now, if the voices have been trained on copy protected sources to create a likenesses (e.g. Scarlet Johansson) then there could be a lawsuit.