If Russia ends up winning after all this… all around depressing and sets a very serious precedent.

1%

Yeah, all good points. I guess it really comes down to selfishness

Secondly, “you need to starve to death because we’re afraid you might live long enough to have kids” is a fucked public policy on the scale of Israeli genocide in Gaza.

I feel the need to defend myself and say that this was not my thinking process. My perspective was purely based on places like China and India. I doubt many are actually starving, but would not you say that the population itself is a bit too much for the region and long term sustainability? Maybe I’m indeed wrong and this is not a problem

Excuse me for being skeptical, but I’ve been hearing about ending world hunger for 3 decades now, and if it’s as easy as moving only 1% of the military budget, then… I just feel like there’s more to this than media tells us on the surface level

Slightly philosophical question, but what does “ending world hunger” mean? Spending 1% of military budget to feed everyone once? Hiring lifelong farmers to build out fields and grow food? Would not food security lead to higher birth rates, which would eventually lead to higher food requirements, when sometimes it already feels somewhat unsustainable? I’m just confused at the meaning behind “ending world hunger”

I get your point, but the reality is that companies do actually put (well, started to) safeguards in place. I feel like I could get murdered on lemmy for saying this, but I was a ChatGPT subscriber for a year, up until last month. The amount of “Sorry Dave, I cannot do that” replies I recently started getting was ruining my experience. OpenAI recently implemented entire new system that transfers you to a different model if it detects something mental going on with you.

Palestine recognized China’s claims on Taiwan. This is honestly an expected response.

I suppose you could argue that the smaller nation’s should all submit to the bigger nations since more people benefit from the bigger nations success

Define success. Pretty much every related study has concluded that smaller countries are most optimal. For pure communism, I think population number was extremly low, something like 500 per community. The richest country per citizen in Europe is also the smallest one. Baltics, having pretty much no natural resources or anything else valuable, are doing fine. Bigger countries tend to start really wasting money and become quite inefficient.

Seriously. There have been always people with mental problems or tendency towards self harm. You can easily find ways to off yourself on google. You can get bullied on any platform. LLMs are just a tool. How detached from reality you get by reading religious texts or ChatGPT convo highly depends on your own brain.

It’s like how entire genre of videogames are now getting censored because of few online incels.

Wait, crypto is still alive?

Honestly, I don’t really trust any cryptobro, I see them on similar level as AI-bros

Counter-argument: all my drug dealers use whatsapp. Real life is not movies, criminals are rarely tech savvy.

Again, that is not a good training material. There have been numerous studies on the type of training data we feed and the result of it. This type of content tends to poison the data and lead to equalivent of brainrot for AI’s. This is not very useful data for AI, there are far better sources. Again, seems highly illogical the EU would do all this just to train some shitty AI. Training material should also always be accompanied by context data, which is commonly missing from instant messaging. It’s just too big of a mess.

My insight: EU is not interested in training AI for your corporations, neither are personal chats with likely zero accuracy/factuality good training material, neither is sms-style grammar going to improve any existing AI, everything about this is illogical and pretty stupid. It has always been about control, not… training AI lol

Can we please stop circlejerking AI into everything? The chat control has been in debate before AI was mainstream

You know it’s bad when CCP starts telling their own people to behave when travelling

I’m a special case though

You should put this info at the start of the comment so that people don’t read the entire comment looking for something useful, but also, do you really not understand the difference between a test/checkup and therapy? Because you quoted the part about therapies, but started talking about tests

How is scaring away smart people going to help you against China?

Russia is not really involved in this afaik. The border issue has been going on for some time, it really kicked off when multiple balloons crossed into Lithuania from Belarus containing contraband. Lithuania closed it’s borders with Belarus as a response, and now this is Belarus response. It just keeps escalating