i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.

they’re not advocating for any of those, and they’re not committing a falacy.

so you recognize that this:

being vegan is one of the most significant reduction to greenhouse emissions that is within your personal choice

it’s not actually a good argument for veganism?

Creating demand for the alternatives funds their R&D and furthers their availability, which in turn leads to better products for lower prices, which makes further adoption much easier.

there is no causal link between any of those events, and increased demand decrease availability.

I don’t really believe what economists claim, v but you don’t even seem to know what they say in the first place

thank you. no matter how many times I point out the inefficacy of consumer choices or how I word it, I end up with bad faith and fact-avoidant responses like you got.

abusing user trust