

Indeed. And as well, even if growth were needed, Google is advocating for US growth at Europe’s expense.


Indeed. And as well, even if growth were needed, Google is advocating for US growth at Europe’s expense.


Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” … Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”
The irony. Is the EU going to fall for this? Or does the EU realise that copyright is in fact the “regulatory friction” that “stifles innovation”?


According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.
Does Europe need growth?
And either way, how does making public service more costly by way of licensing fees increase growth in Europe? The license costs could instead be spent funding more European public workers. That’s growth, no?
Google is advocating for US growth at Europe’s expense.
Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection.
Closed-source software processes data non-transparently, thus compromising GDPR art.5. It’s also a shitty loophole around the GDPR, because when you run a closed-source app, you are technically the one processing the data.
It’s a hole in the GDPR that FOSS fixes.
Why is that? Most public services use Microsoft for email, I find.
FWIW, I boycott both; which means I am mostly using postal mail.