• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    23 days ago

    The US Govt 5 years ago: e2e encryption is for terrorists. The govt should have backdoors.

    The US Govt now: Oh fuck, our back door got breached, everyone quick use e2e encryption asap!

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 days ago

      Different parts of the government. Both existed then and now. There has for a long time been a substantial portion of the government, especially defense and intelligence, that rely on encrypted comms and storage.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    23 days ago

    Everybodies aunt at thanksgiving:

    “I should be fine. I only trust the facebook with my information. Oh, did I tell you? We have 33 more cousins we didn’t know about. I found out on 23andme.com. All of them want to borrow money.”

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Real encrypted apps, …or just the ones their own government can use to spy on them?

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 days ago

    On January 20th: The cyberattack is coming from inside the house!

    Dumbfuck and his cronies now have access to PRISM and ECHELON. Again.

  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Hear me out, maybe we should update pots and sms to have optional end-to-end encryption for modern implementations as well…Optional as backwards compatible and clearly shown as unencrypted when used that way to be clear.

    • micballin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Att won’t make money off that unless they offer it as a paid service. No reason to give that away for free and the other cell carriers can just pay off (bribe with campaign contributions) legislators to understand encryption is “too costly to implement at such a scale”

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    What i read [and corrected] from the article :

    “The hacking campaign [group], nicknamed [ by Microsoft ] Salt Typhoon by Microsoft,
    [ this actual campaign of attacks ] is one of the largest intelligence compromises in U.S. history, and not yet fully remediated. Officials in a press call Tuesday [ 2024-12-3 ] refused to set a timetable for declaring the country’s telecommunications systems free of interlopers. Officials had previously told NBC News that China hacked AT&T, Verizon and Lumen Technologies to spy on customers.”

  • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Question for more tech savvy people: should I be worried about wiping old data, and if so for which apps? Just messaging apps, or also email and social media? Or can I just use the encrypted apps moving forward?

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      the safest perspective to have is this -

      every single thing you send online is going to be there forever. “the cloud” is someone’s server and constitutes online. even end to end encryption isn’t necessarily going to save you.

      for example iCloud backup is encrypted. but Apple in the past has kept a copy of your encryption key on your iCloud. why? because consumers who choose to encrypt and lose their passwords are gonna freak out when all their data is effectively gone forever.

      so when FBI comes a’knocking to Apple with a subpoena… once they get access to that encryption key it doesn’t matter if you have the strongest encryption in the world

      my advice

      never ever ever write something online that you do not want everybody in the world seeing.

      to put on my tin foil hat, i believe government probably has access to methods that break modern encryptions. in theory with quantum computers it shouldn’t be difficult

      • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        I agree with you and I don’t put anything that I would consider questionable online, at least not these days. I’m just having a hard time figuring out what adjustments to make in addition to worrying about personal things I’ve already shared, like my gender and race. You know what I mean? I’m a married woman, and I have info in various places about our family planning choices, to give an example. That’s really starting to worry me, but how can I even begin to delete my data? It’s everywhere. Every doctor has their own patient portal, I have multiple email accounts, and I don’t even want to think about the dumb shit I might have posted when YouTube comment sections were new.

        It’s all really overwhelming.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          yeah i just try not to think about it. I’m glad I was in the myspace generation during my teenage years. so I was actually able to just delete my myspace later on as an adult

          i feel worse for the kids growing up today. they don’t fully understand the implications of what they are posting online. anything and everything is being recorded forever. my generation got a chance to be a stupid kid and have it be forgotten. today’s kids don’t get that opportunity

          the best you can do, though, is just stop posting potentially damaging things online. you can’t change what you already posted. and 999 times out of a thousand, it’s not gonna hurt you.

          i understand the overwhelmed feeling though

  • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    Just stop using your electronic devices. Not like they don’t all have monitors built in already anyway. Every connected device could be sending screenshots home and we’d never know. I mean, I guess you could use something like Wireshark to monitor your home network, but something tells me nowadays there are ways around even that. I’m not a certified network tech or even a script kiddie, but I don’t trust my tech as far as my dog can throw it. I just try to secure through obfuscation as much as possible. Everyone thinks I have carbon monoxide poisoning, but it’s a small price to pay for peace of mind - even a small one.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Do what the Germans did in ww1 when they knew their diplomatic code was broken but couldn’t change it. They put the important stuff in plain sight and treated it like junk mail and encoded the boring stuff.

      • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I’m just saying that, unless you built the device you’re using, and you know what every component does, and you know what it’s doing when, and you know it wasn’t manufactured by a foreign state-owned manufacturer with a penchant for putting spy chips in their devices, then you can’t truly trust anything you do on it, encrypted or not. It doesn’t really matter, if the software is being encrypted by backdoored hardware.

  • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    23 days ago

    Interpretation - the NSA can now crack all common encryption methods, so let’s disadvantage our adversaries at no real cost to us.