• melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wish I could develop my own apps on my own car. I mean I own the car… why can’t I “sideload” my own created apps? Their apps are sht anyways.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You can, but it’s a Google filled minefield. A good view of it is reading into all of the trouble of using Android Auto in GrapheneOS without destroying all the privacy protections. It’s essentially impossible to get navigation going without doing so, but audio for music and phone calls can be done with some hoop jumping. You’re still probably better off just using bluetooth though.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You probably can, just nobody bothers to do it. My Subaru has installable apps. Hell older Hondas (and possibly current ones) just run android. You can even get to the regular android UI on them.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It kind of makes sense to not allow people to do that - just imagine what horrors people will create that totally will kill people. Cars are dangerous.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        100% fearmongering bullshit designed to erode property rights. Cars have been completely “open” throughout their entire history until recently, and the problems caused by irresponsible owner modification have been both negligible and entirely acceptable (compared to the alternative of going full-blown police state to stop them).

        Make no mistake: full-blown police state is exactly what you’re arguing for when you suggest people shouldn’t have the right to modify their own fucking property!

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They would probably have a panic attack if they learned about megasquirt. Cars being locked down is so unnatural that most of their design allows them to be controlled by open source solutions.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        People have been able to change their own brake pads for as long as cars existed.

        • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          56
          ·
          8 hours ago

          There are two things hidden here:

          1. People totally got killed by doing their own maintenance
          2. There is a difference between physical maintenance and, well, you know that people will install some buggy self driving app
          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If saftey is your concern I hope you do not blindly trust manufacturers given their history of “safety and security”. My concern is software freedom: being in control of your own computing (instead of the creator being in control). All software has bugs, but at least 3rd party software isn’t intentionally adding anti-features and spyware.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            the entertainment system should have zero access to anything that controls the movement of the car. androidauto apps can’t implement self driving functions either. if it’s possible, the car manufacturer was incredibly irresponsible and needs to be sued into oblivion. see, the actual problem is not that irresponsible users could implement “self driving apps”, but that the entertainment system lacks any real security, is filled with vulnerabilities, and often even have remote access capabilities with bluetooth/wifi/cellular, and bad actors could load malware wirelessly that would kill the passengers and whoever else on the road.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Not only is is possible, there are many CAN bus attacks from the entertainment system I’ve seen over the years. That, along with your noted remote attacks makes modern cars a nightmare. It doesn’t help that manufacturers cheap out on basic protections to save a few bucks (see the Hyundai boys and the lack of an installed engine interlock).

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                yeah, unfortunately. but do androidauto apps have access to the CAN bus? I would at least hope that this platform would not grant access to it

                • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  One would hope. But given we’ve seen CAN bus attacks over basic radios, I wish I could say I was confident they’ve taken those basic precautions. Car hacking is one of those topics that can keep you up at night when you think about how lax some manufacturers are to save a buck.

            • nyan@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Lacking government regulation in the largest markets, proper separation will never be enforced, because it isn’t to the manufacturers’ benefits. And that probably isn’t going to happen until hacked infotainment systems kill enough people to draw attention, unfortunately.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            People totally got killed by doing their own maintenance

            People have totally gotten killed from maintenance done by a “professional” (new kid on the job at the shop.)

            I watch YouTuber CarCareNut and he’s shown many stupid mistakes made by dealerships.

            I assure you I take greater care doing repairs than a tech who will get yelled at if they don’t finish the job fast.