• shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I mean I’d say the Stage of Technology we’ve been in since like 2010 has been very detrimental for the individual and destructive to society. Social media, smartphones, surveillance states. AI is an even worse version of these. If social media ran by billionaires are not open, unbiased, non-manipulative emotional-reactaction-over-critical-thinking silos, what makes you think all these LLMs run by millionaires and billionaires won’t be? They’re just the next step in social media.

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think this is all very person-dependent. I have found 3d printing resources/tips/experiences from others. I have gotten into building my own antennas after learning about VNAs via social media. I have gotten into SDRs, ham radio, electronics thanks to shtuff on social media. I have learned a few new 3d modeling tricks via social media. I have found a few suggestions for go packages, etc. I could keep going for years about what I have run into online.

      I have found the world’s knowledge available at my fingertips. Others are finding tiktok dances. I think this is a matter of who you are and what you prefer to do than “the bad tech” making people somehow bad. You will find that people through history have fit a similar distribution of people who are into learning and people who just want to be entertained.

    • sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I agree on all of this, but were books different (except for surveillance)?

      • Back then those authors that wrote books with messaging supporting the owner class received loads of coverage from their media andtherefore spread their propaganda far and wide. While the average Joe could write whatever they want, nobody was able to see it (until now with social media), because printing is timeconsuming and expensive, and marketing even more so.
      • Back then fascists spread their ideas in books, today they do on social media. In both cases supported by the money of the 1%.
      • Back then only politically active people were surveilled, now it is everyone. This is a big change.
      • Back then entertainment was inexpensive, now it is basically free.

      Also that’s not really the point the article is making. They say that simply reading books makes you smarter. As if people read physics books in their freetime back then. No, they just read entertaining stories, and now they stream entertaining stories. Nothing has fundamentally changed. Back then Oil made you part of the owner class, now it’s IT and the owning of marketplaces.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You’re also ignoring the massive rise in literacy rates as compared to when books were new. Most people simply could not read them.