• ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    “I had expected there would be much more of a watchful expectancy of the results of the Australian ban before governments would be jumping in quite as quickly,” she told DW. “We don’t know what the effects of the ban are going to be and we need to evaluate this carefully. Governments need to be careful to avoid thinking that social media bans are a silver bullet to this problem.”

    Almost as if there are ulterior motives…

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Every government is doing it all at once. Chat control, age checks, masterbaitorbases.

      All to submit us to new tech, palantir and their ilk, to feed all of our information to get social scores to determine winners and losers, secretly in a way we cannot know or challenge, by the antichrist that wants to spray critics and opponents with fentanyl by drone by his own words, a technofascist that is not trying to hide it and already has all the information federal agencies had exported to it through doge, on top of their data banks.

      They want to id every account, every ip, to faces, biometrics, and id, and record everything with their threat assessments, and promulgate their half baked assumptions from business to government. Make no mistake, our governments are trying to surrender us to tech with these laws, protecting kids is just the trojan horse. Assurances of not storing the information are laughable, tech will keep it, the US will get it, your own country will get it. Your politicians will get an option to slip the names of people they choose into the bad score list too, that’s always one of the under the table selling points on these things.