• salvor_hardin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    It is quite private from what I understand. You don’t share email phone and can evrn choose pay through privacy friendly means. The only thing is, it drains a lot of battery on grapheneOS. To an extent that i had stop using it.

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have found more websites refuse to load with Mullvad VPN than when I use Proton VPN. I use Mullvad on my phone since it’s the only one that is able to be used while I also use Tailscale VPN at the same time on Android.

  • user314_lemmus_v3s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    From what I know it’s considered “better” because it’s one of the first to use things like shadowsocks.

    Usually ISP can detect you are using a VPN, some countries/isp actively block it.

    With obfuscation it looks like normal trafic thus, harder to block or to detect you are using VPN at all.

    “Mullvad’s Shadowsocks integration is designed to help users bypass internet censorship and restrictive firewalls by routing traffic through obfuscated bridge servers.”

    So, it’s up to you if it matters or not.

    • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It’s a really cool feature that I think needs to become a standard option for other VPNs that are actually serious about what they are doing. Also whenever I hear shadowsocks I always think of a pair of vantablack socks on my feet.

      • user314_lemmus_v3s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s tempting to want it by default but it comes at a cost.

        I would prefer to have it as an option. Also it’s a game of cat and mouse, if shadowsocks becomes popular, they learn to block it better eventually so you need to move to something else. In fact shadowsocks is considered “old”, we also have Hysteria, XRay and other…

        P.S I don’t know why I know these thighs because I don’t even have a VPN, i just find it interesting as a technology…

        • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Well that’s what’s I meant. An option rather than an always on type thing (going to edit the post for my own clarity). But you do make a good point. Tech is cool and it’s good to be informed, especially with the changes going on these days. Being informed is important.

    • Felis_Rex@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why’s that? I used it for torrents a few weeks ago and at least speeds were fine. Definitely slower but not terrible.

      Does it leak data or something?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They don’t offer port forwarding. Due to the way torrents work, at least one person (either seed or peer) needs to have port forwarding enabled for the connection to be stable. So if you don’t have port forwarding, you’ll only be able to connect to people who have forwarded theirs. So even if a seed pool shows a lot of available seeds, you may only be able to connect to a few of them. It also means your torrents will take ages to seed, which can be important for private trackers where you need to maintain a certain ratio or you’ll get banned.

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            If you (a Joe Schmo nobody) were able to get an invite, you really think a media company with millions of dollars of funding wouldn’t be able to do the same? They could easily get moles into every single private trackers, complete with full backgrounds to pass the interview process. Private trackers aren’t preferred because they’re inherently more secure. At best, that is only security theater, the same as the TSA. They’re preferred because enforced seeding rules, verified uploaders, etc ensures their torrents are healthy and helps prevent “video.mp4.exe” types of malware uploads.

            Plus most people use a mix of public and private trackers. Private trackers are obviously preferred, but sometimes you don’t want to kill your existing ratio with a massive download that will take weeks to seed back up to 1.0.

            • gravitas@lem.ugh.im
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              They could easily get moles into every single private trackers

              Maybe if they actually wanted to, but what actually happens is they hire a much smaller company that monitors public trackers and sends them thousands of “successful” takedowns. When have you seen private trackers taking down torrents due to DMCA? It pretty much never happens, even for public ones these days the best case for these companies is to get google or other search engines to remove torrent sites from results.

              You are giving these corps WAAAY too much credit, they only target the lowest of low hanging fruit (ISPs and search engines) because anything else is a waste of time and money. There’s a reason you don’t hear about many lawsuits against private individuals anymore, its because they know its a bad idea to go after “Joe Schmo NoBody” with a net worth of $217 in the bank, who will just declare bankruptcy after the corp spends tens or hundreds of thousands of $ on lawyers for a single case.

      • nfreak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        They don’t offer port forwarding so it sucks for seeding. It works but it severely limits the clients you can seed to.

    • jklem@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I discovered they were bought by an Israeli company and stopped using them. Regardless of one’s opinion on Israel/Palestine, I would hope we could all agree Israel is known for using many complex tools and intelligence operations to break digital security and collect data, so this did not feel safe to me any longer.