• Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    If that alone makes a democracy a joke, I think that there wouldn’t be many non-joke democracies.

    Which would be a correct statement. There should be at least a timeout before a legislation can be proposed again, with changes substantial enough to justify the new vote.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a thought, though that’ll also introduce some new political strategies that one might not want, like making poison-pilling legislation a much-more-powerful move or immediately proposing and voting down legislation just before a given legislature departs to kill the ability of the incoming legislators to pass that legislation.

      It also may be hard to draw that “substantial enough” line. Similar problem to determining what qualifies as a rider for the purposes of anti-rider restrictions (“you can’t just attach unrelated legislation to legislation” and “well, what qualifies as unrelated?”).