Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoNet neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1697arrow-down14
arrow-up1693arrow-down1external-linkNet neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·7 days agoBummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
minus-squareAnn Archy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoI got a fun little thing here in my hand that is quite appealing.
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 days agoAnything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
minus-squareAnti_Iridium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoYeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court. They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
minus-squareRentlar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·7 days agoKnowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.
minus-squareZorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·7 days agoThey could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.
Bummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
Then it can’t be appealed later.
I got a fun little thing here in my hand that is quite appealing.
Anything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
Yeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court.
They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
Knowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.
They could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.