• 2nko@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, it is meant to COMPLETELY DESTROY THE DREAMS OF VCC (h266) SUPPORTERS- I mean, it’s 30% more efficient compared to AV1 as others pointed out.

      Also, this means we’re approaching a moment where most of our devices decode AV1 natively without use of dav1d (although I still use it since sometimes hardware decoders for some reason mess up shit)

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      AV2, a generation leap in open video coding and the answer to the world’s growing streaming demands, delivers significantly better compression performance than AV1. AV2 provides enhanced support for AR/VR applications, split-screen delivery of multiple programs, improved handling of screen content, and an ability to operate over a wider visual quality range. AV2 marks a milestone on the path to an open, innovative future of media experiences.

      https://aomedia.org/press releases/AOMedia-Announces-Year-End-Launch-of-Next-Generation-Video-Codec-AV2-on-10th-Anniversary/

    • Matth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      AV2 vs AV1: What the Next-Gen Video Codec Brings to the Table

      Or older article but more comprehensive : AV1 vs AV2 Video Codec: 7 Key Differences You Need to Know. It’s key takeaways :

      AV2 delivers 30% better compression efficiency than AV1, which already compresses 30% better than HEVC (H.265).

      AV2 encoding demands 2-3 times more computational power than AV1, requiring advanced hardware like RTX 5090 for practical use.

      AV2 will officially release by end of 2025, with widespread hardware support expected around 2027 or later.

      AV2 introduces advanced features like split-screen delivery, enhanced AR/VR support, and dynamic bitrate switching for adaptive streaming.

      88% of AOMedia members plan to implement AV2 within two years, despite infrastructure and hardware compatibility challenges.

      • Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        So AV2 in a homelab is grossly inappropriate as this seems like something more geared up for server farm status. Odds are most homelabs aren’t rocking that kinda hardware and there’s probably an energy consumption cost and hardware cost factor to measure against how much someone is really saving compared to just AV1 which a intel ARC card can handle. You’d probably have to be rocking a homelab with 100s of TB of stuff to even come close to maybe wanting to go to AV2 hardware and codec?

        • commander@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think first would be wait to see how well it can be decoded/transcoded on CPUs for peoples current equipment. Won’t be able to have as many concurrent streams as codecs with hardware support. AV2 hardware is probably years away. I’m certain AV2 hardware will succeed unlike VVC which had a blip of support with Intel then abandoned the next generation of Intel chips. I’ll switch to AV2 once it has similar adoption to like AV1 today so like 8 years from now I guess. I’m guessing similar amount of time for hardware support to be as ubiquitous. Not sure if it should be quicker with how dead in the water VVC has been for 6 years or slower because people upgrade hardware less frequently now and honestly h.264 is still good enough and AV1 is really good enough so any rush to AV2 will mostly be hyperscalers trying to cut down on bandwidth and storage costs