• melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    The article has specific advice about how to make sure the layoffs are a wise decision before cutting the jobs. In the movie, Office Space, they had consultants interviewing everyone and determining who is adding value or not. I guess those were the good ol’ days and now we’ve gotten to the point where the only consideration is whether this will make the numbers look good this quarter.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh Forbes, you helped create the fiasco and now you pretend that rich people will pay for it? … Nobody believes you.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ve been involved directly or through family through five layoffs in the last three years. You’re so right.

      These companies all hire Bain Capital, their consultants open their “defaultwallstreetfellatingdystopianlayoffplan.docx,” and talk to upper management who has no idea what people on the ground do. They put the people and salaries in a spreadsheet, show the CEO, and nobody in a decision-making role ever directly confronts human-to-laid-off-human the cost of what they are doing.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely correct. Literally the only thing that matters is quarterly earnings.

      That’s why everything you buy and use sucks now and is perpetually getting shittier.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        As always, Star Trek knows what’s up:

        The speed of technological advancement isn’t nearly as important as short term quarterly gains. - Quark s4e7 (little green men)