I can see that, I guess even practicing deployment would be useful. There’s enough weird splintering in some projects that even perceived competition can seem like trouble.
It’s my git server, I can put what I want on it.
MIT is easy when I don’t really have long term plans for it.
If I am contributing to a GPL project i’ll use their license.
The real shitshow is it’s MIT licensing. Corporate takeover 101
Corporate takeover?
Ubuntu has always belong to a corporation.
It’s not like it’s a community project. Ubuntu has always belonged to Canonical.
Coreutils isn’t only for ubuntu. Ubuntu just seems to be the lab rat corporation.
There are many kinds of corporations, my friend. Canonical is different from Apple. Wait a second… Wasn’t OS X built on FreeBSD?
How is it a takeover, if they write their own set of tools?
The gnu brained folks hate when we make our own tools.
Square that circle for us?
Have you ever publish a tool that already has a gnu counterpart? Even if you say it’s for learning or an experiment you still get hounded about it.
Why publish an experiment?
To get feedback? For fun?
I can see that, I guess even practicing deployment would be useful. There’s enough weird splintering in some projects that even perceived competition can seem like trouble.
It’s my git server, I can put what I want on it. MIT is easy when I don’t really have long term plans for it. If I am contributing to a GPL project i’ll use their license.