• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    If it runs modern Linux, there’s enough bloat even compared to Windows 2000.

    COMMENT: further I’ve completely forgot what you were saying, so wrote a very loosely connected text.

    I agree in dreams, but in truth no piece of tech will change life. Life changes tech. Today’s tech environment wouldn’t happen were social environment different.

    If we want to make computing better, we need to be able to live without computing.

    To make downtime acceptable. Same as with repairing floors in a hoarder’s apartment, you need to remove all the furniture and junk first. So you (being the hoarder) need to be able to live just fine without what’s in that room for a few weeks (I know ideally the process takes much less time).

    The reason Facebook and others are so powerful and competition doesn’t work is because many people can’t live without what they rely upon as utilities.

    And the “users mustn’t think, users mustn’t overcome themselves” mantra is commercial bullshit. Users are humans and are responsible for themselves. We can help them become more responsible. We can’t pretend humans are not responsible.

    Because ultimately only humans exist and tools are tools.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      You all downvote but that OS runs on a microcontroller. No need for a microcode/management engine running a UEFI runnng a bootstrap running a OS that initializes locales for a console that runs a display server that initializes locale settings to run a webbrowser with his own locale settings, where some “web-developers” then again try to determine environment and capabilities via JavaScript to simulate desktop apps.

      Btw, why don’t we just start standardizing CPU interfaces and cut down all the compatibility layers?