• TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    Peak capitalism, steal everything from the masses, remix and regurgitate it so no one is the wiser, then sell it back to them via a subscription model.

    Makes me sick.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Rules for thee, not for me.

    Pirating anything isn’t illegal anymore. If the government can pick and choose people and groups who don’t have to pay for patent or copyright, then there are no patents or copyrights.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        True. Profit is about the only thing these companies will never generate, but there’s still money being thrown at them, it’s just being spent on bonuses, mergers, and data centers.

        Scrapers could peel off 1B of that to pay for what they’re taking (like the pay for antique, print only books—because they can’t physically steal those) instead of just robbing the commons if they really wanted to, if they thought that anything they were doing was ethically defensible or financially sustainable. ___

  • orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Leadership,” well, here’s hopin they find a way to materialize intellectual property and speculative investment, since that’s like, the only metrics they use and neither of them are actually, y’know, real.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I am okay with that. As long we are consistent with the copyright law. If OpenAI can break copyright to make their own money, it should be legal to me too.

    Laws should be the same for everyone and no one should be above the law

  • wallwood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Chinese models like Kimi are already competing head-to-head with Claude Opus in term of capability. And the main reason that kimi isn’t as widely used as Claude is because Chinese companies aren’t burning investors money to keep subscription prices low. I wonder how long will this dominance can last. Since investor money will eventually run out. and once that happens, what plans do they have to keep competing with free open weight models that already closed the gap.