• Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    codeberg is such an obvious choice, i have no idea why people don’t immediately switch from GitHub

    • snooting@wetshav.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      They don’t allow for private repos, so it’s a non-starter for companies unless they want to self-host.

            • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              it’s a lot of code, not a lot of data. If any repo has binary files you’ll most likely need to store it somewhere else as there’s not even an option to pay that used storage.

            • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah no I’m not complaining about their decision. Quite happy about it! I just comment this in every “github alternative” comment section when codeberg is brought up for the sake of codeberg too because we don’t want to flood them with people who would also set up private repos that break their ToS.

              I have an account and contribute on Codeberg but keep my private, non FOSS/not-sure-of-license-yet repos somewhere else (currently gitlab).