anus@lemmy.world to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago

A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment

andymasley.substack.com

-56

A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment

andymasley.substack.com

anus@lemmy.world to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago

The numbers clearly show this is a pointless distraction for the climate movement

Chat

Beppe_VAL@feddit.it
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
3
arrow-down
1·
2 months ago
Even Sam Altman acknowledged last year the huge amount of energy needed by chatgpt, and the need for a breakthrough in energy breakthrough…
- anus@lemmy.worldOP
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  1
  arrow-down
  7·
  2 months ago
  Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

544 users / day
2.03K users / week
4.21K users / month
11.2K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
72.3K subscribers
2.17K Posts
10.9K Comments
Modlog