Oh no, an opposition’s proposition was rejected, how shocking, that has never happened before! (/s)
Sarcasm asides, this is not really as scandalous or surprising or anything as the article frames it. A proposition initiated by opposition parties don’t often get accepted. Best case the proposition gets altered more or less and is reinitiated by a governing party, and that is generally so, this is no exception.
Every article and paper I found so far concludes that AI improves the ability of medical personnel to recognize and diagnose cancer.
And no, it is not uncalled for, because I had to deal with such bullshit the whole damn day (and not for the first time) and it is enough. I’m logging out for today.
I give up.
Apparently you do have to caveat every little fucking case for every screwed up situation that could ever exist. OBVIOUSLY these scans have to be double checked and OBVIOUSLY “reliable” does not mean “never ever could something go wrong” and OBVIOUSLY shitty or overworked personnel makes wrong decisions.
But if you have to account for all that in every yet so minor argument you want to make you’d have to write at least a bachelor thesis level publication about the weather being warm and sunny outside my window right now.
You cannot have a basic discussion about any topic on this level so screw it, I’m out of this.
I’m fucking autistic and love to get into unnecessary depths of details but this is too much even for me AND YES I KNOW autism is a spectrum so YES OBVIOUSLY there will be some people WHO MIGHT NOT EVEN BE AUTISTIC who love it even more to discuss these details but this is just dumb and I just can’t anymore.
I know there are reliable AI applications, for example cancer recognition models scanning CT imaging.
However, from what I know systems trying pattern recognition in human behaviour are the opposite of these medical implementations.
An unreliable warning system that spams you with useless warnings shouldn’t exist at all.
YES! ESACTLY WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY!
No, my point is exactly AI’s fallability and the implications of too fallible systems being implemented in conjunction with those systems uploading every data.
Sorry for thinking other people would be smart enough to pick that up.
A warning syszem should not be able to be ignired easily. A warning system you can block out is not a working warning system.
Holy shit, I got to spell out every little obviousness today.
No, that’s not what I meant. What is the point of a warning system that can easily be ignored?
Where is the point then?
AI will assess if they are looking at the road and, depending on speed, give a warning if they don’t.
And I am totally sure it will not misread someone turning their head to secure a lane change going 220 km/h on the Autobahn and will not spook them with a sudden, unexpected alarm sound making the driver jerk the steering wheel causing a horrible crash.
Hey, german government, parliament and federal council. This is how that works, now do that, too. For fucks sake!
Which is why I’m confused I never heard of any legal action from the copyrights or trademark holders. The Tolkien Estate is quite litigious from what I’ve heard and you can’t tell me a spyware called Palantir or a weapon called Anduril is too far removed from Tolkien’s writing that it wouldn’t count as an infringement.
I really wish the Tolkien Estate would just sue all these surveillance and military companies over copyright infringements.
Why does Denmark of all places have a big celebration of the US-american Independence Day?
Your definition of bullying is wrong and I won’t discuss with you anything. Bye.
Dude is a corpo shill or ragebait troll, at least in his comments. Have a look at their modlog.
I don’t get it. What’s so special about 100bn $/€ companies? Isn’t it better to have multiple smaller companies than fewer bigger corporations? It’s not like big corps pay more taxes and anti trust laws don’t exiat for no reason either.
I thought that to mean Central and Eastern Europe, wtf?
Tell that to CIA operatives in South American drug cartels.