That would be awesome. It’s pretty much super asbestos.

And he’s so full of hot air he doesn’t even need a suit.

No.

While this does fuck him, it’s also sound safety science. Touch screens have made cars less safe. It just so happens that Musk’s company makes shitty unsafe cars which got rid of buttons to cut costs.

Legality has never been morality. Slavery was legal, still technically is.

Because in the kindle store you’re not purchasing the book but a license to the book.

The have all the morale, non of the morals.

Gizmodo is a trash source, they are telling you what you want to hear.

These people were collateral from their scatter shot mass firing of all probationary employees. Breaking the agencies that regulate his businesses is the goal, but they aren’t specifically targeting employees who are regulating his products.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fda-staff-reviewing-musks-neuralink-were-included-doge-employee-firings-sources-2025-02-17/

You know the first people they fired were all the inspector generals right? Those are the watch dogs who investigate where the money is going and watch out for people breaking the law. And they illegally fired the head of the office that protects government whistleblowers. He’s currently counting on the Supreme Court to uphold the law.

This is absurd. Not because of your personal preferences but because you are so naive and narrow minded as to be incapable of imagining another viewpoint. This thinking is why the world is falling apart.

Better watch out, when the king of the US government is done with all the queers and chronically ill the baldies are next.

That’s an orangutan, you can tell by the color.

Do you have any good sources for Russia’s inability to jam Starlink? I find that claim dubious.

Lol, protectionism for the administration’s fellators.

Walgreens CEO, “We lost business due to our locked shelves.”

CVS: “Hold my beer.”

Only if the media paints it that way for ad impressions.

How do those platforms survive though? Any media centric federated platform will require a lot of funding if it’s successful. Grants and donations only take them so far. So to avoid serving ads that probably means subscription fees. Is there revenue sharing for creators? Will the platforms be designed for either or does each instance have to roll their own? There’s a lot of unanswered questions. All the things that made YouTube dominant required a lot of investment, especially in hardware. No peertube instance will ever be half as efficient as YouTube is behind the scenes. Which means their costs will be way higher.