snooggums

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ow, my sides.

The best part is they are accurately describing what they are doing. Disrupting a working system is a negative thing. They are telling everyone that they are assholes out to ruin things and then painting it as a positive!

“The front fell off.”

Along with that, of course, the global fast-food giant will look to improve customer experience by introducing AI to allow drive-through, kiosk, and app tech serve visitor more effectively.

Oh cool, I can get a side of nazi apologism with my sandwich!

They are grat for things that benwfit from havibg flexible touch anywhere interaction like maps.

They suck for anything you want to touch without looking away from the road, like temp controls.

Honda still including buttons and knobs for climate controls was a huge factor for my last purchase. A few brands were instantly rejected because they had climate controls in the touch screen and I had already hated that experience from rentals and my in law’s cars.

“Stop trying to make fetch AI happen. It’s not going to happen.”

AI is worse that adding no value, it is an actual detriment.

Yes, chrome is doing something different. It is even worse!

Fuck ICE.

Between the lines: “Big Tech and anyone else who seeks to engage in anticompetitive or illegal behavior have been put on notice,” a commission source told Axios in announcing the new hires:

Bunch of fucking words until something is actually done. Plus everyone else the administration has put in place is a liar, so the words are actually a good indication that big tech should be prepared for tons of back pats and handjobs.

Plus the initial sales were to people who had already committed to preorders at a lower price for a truck that was hyped up to be far better than the end result.

Cybertrucks are basically No Man’s Sky but without the possibility of being good in a half decade.

Odds on the opt out actually opting you out instead of pretending to?

Building garbage and convincing people it is absolutely necessary to pay someone for it is the American way.

That is accurate, but people who design and distribute the LLMs refer to the process as machine learning and use terms like hallucinations which is the primary cause of the confusion.

He won’t tho.

Why would the administration that pushed for the ban intervene?

But what’s the alternative?

Posting the information on an official page and creating links with summaries on social media.

Just put it on the platform most people are using and don’t add extra steps to see what’s needed.

Most, but not all people should be a deal breaker for a public service announcement.

No, because a focus on quality would require defining quality and then curating the content through some kind of process that would not end up being ‘social media’.

Quality will never be defined by popularity, which is the entire focus of social apps.

They put up signs that the scan will be deleted after verification, but I am guessing that is a misdirection and a hash of the scan is saved like how fingerprint scanners work. Otherwise there would be no need for the scanners since a person is there to verify the scan already…

Musk would benefit hy increased interest in Starlink as the ‘safer’ option.

Putin benefits from causing chaos.

Musk and Putin have been in contact for the last couple of years.

So yeah, it probably is to benefit Starlink.