

Really? That’s the opposite of my experience. But maybe we have had discussions on different communities about different topics. 😅 I can imagine certain political topics being trained by that, or?


Really? That’s the opposite of my experience. But maybe we have had discussions on different communities about different topics. 😅 I can imagine certain political topics being trained by that, or?


Oh how I am in your boat, buddy. The more clickbaity, the less value I know I’m getting.
A good article shouldn’t need to have an “ending” that can be “spoiled”.
A good article should be interesting to read because of its content, and to find out more “behind” whatever conclusion there might be.
A headline like “How we now understand humans are actually blobs of soft fungus” might pique my interest. You have the conclusion right there, but why?


We’re so f—ed.


I have no idea, just talking about an alternative title “Missed the wave”. I care very little about Microsoft these days. 😅 I only use a fraction of their products for work because I’m forced to. (Authenticator, Outlook, Azure, basically.)


I know right. They dodged the AI bullet would be a more accurate headline.


lol what do you mean bait? I baited you somehow? 😅 I didn’t mean to if so.


And can you not get that from vegetables instead?


Oh, that almost feels abandoned at that point.


Would Anubis help here?


What you’re getting is [the fact] that it’s not digested?


Banned for a week from /c/Technology for this comment wreckage in this post. Gotta be a special someone to get banned from /c/Technology. 😂
That modlog was brutal though. Well deserved ban. What. a. child. 👌


Which algs would that be? ed25519 okay? Is that even an encryption alg? I’m not too hot with encryption.


30 M gallons ≈ 113.5 M liters for the rest of us earthlings. Insane amount.


It’s a balance of course. If you find really critical bugs that need fixing, it’s hard to pass up, but it will of course be weighed with the amount of noise. Let’s hope they manage to bring down the noise.


Not including berries in “fruit” is weird AF.
I said in the traditional definition. Fruit includes berries as well in the scientific definition, yes.
Was everyone using the scientific definition all along? Kind of unusual but I’ll take it.
Anecdotal evidence
Excuse me but it doesn’t matter in this case based on what you asked me.
You asked, that I prove that people can have a healthy diet without fruit, which would imply that your hypothesis is that you can’t. So I give you two examples that disprove the hypothesis, and you reject them? That’s not the scientific method, sir.
All that aside, I’m glad you believe me, because I have no reason to lie of course.
Vegetables are essential, and I eat those. Had I not eaten them, I think we wouldn’t be having this discussion. 😅 I’d be eating a lot of supplements or be dead or dying.


Fiber isn’t something the body can break down, so what are you getting from it?


Same as you 🖐️, also participated in a lot of discussions. I loved it, it was so much fun. I miss that aspect, because a lot of my interests aren’t represented well here in the fediverse. Alas…
Interesting how it’s almost the exact opposite here for me.
I have run into some really bad eggs here, admittedly, mostly lately and with much newer accounts than mine, telling me they’re probably late Reddit emigrants, which is a red flag for me. Some really deranged people are always gonna be on every platform.
But mostly it’s been good vibes here. I hope you have a better experience so that you feel better about the ratio soon. 😅
Take care!