Human nature dictates we do things before we discuss if we should do things.

To me it starts getting into a philosophical discussion but unfortunately I don’t think as a species we are mature enough yet to have these discussions.

A good real world example of this is in Canada the separation movement by Quebec vs. Alberta. In Quebec there have been years of open public discussion before they ultimately took a vote. They were painfully away of all the nuance that came from leaving Canada. They did it right to a large extent. Compare that to Daniella Smith in Alberta and she’s hammering through the mechanisms for a vote to happen meanwhile the public has absolutely no understanding of the ramifications of if they do vote to leave Canada. They’re doing it wrong.

Human nature by default seems to want to change the front tyre while doing 120 on the highway. This needs to change.

Is the article about Google or Apple? Really easy question for you.

I don’t use apple for the same reason I don’t use fisher price as an adult. You are free to use your technology made for babies that’s beside the point. The point is that the article in discussion is about Tim Cook and Apple providing a recent bribe to Trump.

Your comment is providing no value. You are attempting whataboutism and really shows the type of person you are more than anything.

To be clear, if googl was caught bribing and someone said “buh buh buh Apple!” Id be saying the same thing. Stop sucking dick like they owe you something to take a side.

When Google bribes Trump with a 24k gold gift let’s discuss Google then ok?

Removed by mod

You’re right it’s both now can we fuck off with the “buh buh buh the other company!” bullshit?

Article is about Apple not Google.

I’m a sex vegetarian gotta be a bit open