Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down13
arrow-up197arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareArtisian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-22 days agoI also read through the judgement, and I think it’s better for anthropic than you describe. He distinguishes three issues: A) Use any written material they get their hands on to train the model (and the resulting model doesn’t just reproduce the works). B) Buy a single copy of a print book, scan it, and retain the digital copy for a company library (for all sorts of future purposes). C) Pirate a book and retain that copy for a company library (for all sorts of future purposes). A and B were fair use by summary judgement. Meaning this judge thinks it’s clear cut in anthropics favor. C will go to trial.
I also read through the judgement, and I think it’s better for anthropic than you describe. He distinguishes three issues:
A) Use any written material they get their hands on to train the model (and the resulting model doesn’t just reproduce the works).
B) Buy a single copy of a print book, scan it, and retain the digital copy for a company library (for all sorts of future purposes).
C) Pirate a book and retain that copy for a company library (for all sorts of future purposes).
A and B were fair use by summary judgement. Meaning this judge thinks it’s clear cut in anthropics favor. C will go to trial.