• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    As the US Congressional commission on similar laws reported decades ago

    • age verification is ineffective with highly adverse impacts
    • client-side filtering[1] is more effective with less adverse impacts.

    Those conclusions still hold today.


    1. ie, parental controls, which have been available & widespread for ages. Parents supply their children with technology & pay for everything they have. It’s entirely within their power to enable parental controls on all their children’s devices instead of expect government to take over their parenting duties. ↩︎

    • sleen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The state has no place for parenting children, the parents are there specifically for this.

      All this is going to result in, is a half working system that has no understanding of the differences between a child and a adolescent - ultimately spewing out ageist tropes that will further dehumanise fully aware individuals.

      Children should be engaged with and actively tailoring their scope of internet usage - and as they grow up to be adolescents, freedom should be provided. This is all active, growing with the individual for the individual.