• 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I dont really care that the average person still uses twitter… What’s INFURIATING is that gov’t agencies are still using that shit. Why are important pieces of information still being shared on twitter??

      • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        My friend works for a local town that has a presence on fb, twitter, and inatgarm. The main reason he says they haven’t moved to platforms like blsky is because as a government entity they are required to be able to archive all online communications for situations like a Right-to-know request but run into the issue that these small platforms aren’t supported by the archiving software so they can’t move away completely until then. Fun fact: 1st amendment prevents the government pages from removing or hiding comments you leave on their posta

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Would that stop them from duplicating the information on other platforms?

          • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            It does if it can’t be archived, any official posts must be available for a right to know request so they could post on Facebook or twitter but other sites that don’t have a way to archive or a third party to archive they can’t make official posts

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              But my question is, does it not count as being archived if it’s exactly the same message that’s posted to another platform that is archived?

              • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                It doesn’t because you’re not just arching the original message but any comments and reactions that message receives as well

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I feel like the common use cases are:

      1. you’re MAGA nut
      2. you’re not a MAGA nut, but you want to see what the loonies are talking about
      3. You’re a marketer or influencer and you know MAGA nuts also buy shit
        • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I bet I could sell MAGA a “tactical” survival kit that’s just an old fanny pack with a bag of jelly beans inside labeled “blowjob tree seeds”.

    • mienshao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think this every single time I see news about that website. Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform? Insanity.