ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1507arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square133linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoI feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
minus-squarerageagainstmachines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoDidn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.