Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production.

The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure.

IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Because they thought they didn’t and found out 3 year old in-house AI test assets ended up in the release version. And promptly replaced them with the actual art done by their own actual artists, the ones who did the AI experiment.

    • canofcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s fine, but they did use AI in development, so whether or not they removed the assets they should not be included in this award category.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You do acknowledge that “using AI during development” is a massive thing to ban games for.

        How can they check for that in the future?

        • canofcam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I don’t know. It’s not really up to me to figure that out, either. Companies should self-report on their AI usage.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          it’s irrelevant whether you agree with the rule or not… the award is for games that didn’t use AI during development. the game should not have originally been in contention for the award

          i tend to agree this is the right way to use AI assets, but this isn’t the award for them… it doesn’t matter if it was accidental, if it was removed before release, or anything else

          • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yes it’s their rule. It’s a stupid rule.

            But how do they intend to police said rule in the future? Since it clearly isn’t just for released art assets but THE WHOLE PROCESS.

            If it’s just self reported what’s the point?

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              20 hours ago

              that’s all irrelevant though… the rule is the rule and they got caught

              people should be allowed to have awards for games which only use humans, and if a game is caught cheating they should be disqualified

              if they want to compete for some awards, these aren’t the awards for them: there are others

              • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Yes yes. They used AI, they lost the award. I’m over it. Next topic:

                How do they (indie awards) enforce this in the future? Please read, understand and explain:

                The rules say no AI can be used in ANY stage of the development for ANYTHING. How do they check it? Where do they draw the line? Is it just art assets? Voices? Code?

                • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  You know, any studio today that cares about winning the indie award as much as you seem to would probably just ask the award coordinators for clarification.

                  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    TBH this is the first time I heard about these awards 😅

                    My flavour of neurospicy just doesn’t understand vague rules with massive issues with how to interpret them.

                    So you’re perfectly fine with vague rules like that?