• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Good. Fuck em. Wish they’d lose even more and more frequently. Along with every other asshole company out there screwing us all.

  • TransNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    a company complaining about losing 36b while not paying a living wage is as pathetic as a rich guy bitching about dropping 2 pennies while handing his valet a 5 cent tip after raping the valet’s 5 year old daughter.

  • Tetragrade@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    These greedy fucking CEOs are trashing production on purpose. Take the company off them for efficiency’s sake.

  • zeroConnection@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 day ago

    Professor Kwon Seok-joon at Sungkyunkwan University previously estimated that the 18-day walkout alone would cause 10 trillion to 17 trillion won ($17 billion) in direct losses, while JPMorgan has projected total losses of up to 43 trillion won ($28 billion) when factoring in labor costs and extended production disruption.

    Nice☺️ Let them suffer even more!

    Samsung sent a letter to the union today following the collapse of talks earlier this week, proposing that both sides resume talks without preconditions on Saturday, but union head Choi Seung-ho rejected the overture, telling Korean media that negotiations could take place after June 7, the scheduled end date of the strike.

    You had years to make things right, cunts, so you can suffer through 18 days of losses at the very least.

    If you weren’t such horrible greedy abominations, you could have just given the 28 billion in bonuses. Fucking greedy cunts should pay hundred fold now.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s pretty simple. They can pay workers what they deserve or:

      1. Workers strike until the company is bankrupt.
      2. Workers or other investors buy up factory at a discount
      3. Same workers come back and get the wages they deserve under new company
  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    https://www.techspot.com/news/112343-samsung-chip-workers-reject-340000-bonus-sk-hynix.html

    For context, Samsung offered the workers a one-time $340K bonus. Workers refused, since their competitor SK-Hynix has annual employee profit-sharing. SK employees are getting $477K bonuses this year, and $900K next year. The 18 day strike will cost Samsung around $250K loss per employee. This likely won’t be the last strike.

    The disputes are over profits from HBM memory used in AI servers. Expect memory prices to keep going up.

  • SigHunter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ohh, poor corporation, if only there was a way to not make that happen. Oh wait, there is, just pay them good money

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      ·
      2 days ago

      you have to wonder how much it would cost to pay their workers a real wage versus taking a $2B!!! a day loss from strikes.

        • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s not higher salary that’s a big deal, it’s the bonus

          For reference sk hynix employees are expecting to get 900k next year

        • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 day ago

          More strikes are likely to happen in the future if they dont conceed and even if there are strikes, underpaying your employees can lead to them leaving for better opportunities and you will likely have to replace them at higher cost, lower experience or both.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Considering that each chaebol owns many industries, that money goes right back into the pockets of Samsung. The chaebols effectively include company stores, with their own versions of KFC, Wendy’s, Krogers, Wal-Mart, 7-11, and so forth.

          It is that never-ending greed of the rich, that makes them dissatisfied with merely getting most of the money. I suspect that even if they got everything, the executives would demand the flesh of the workers - because 100% isn’t enough, it must be MORE.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          $2B/day is somehow.like 12 times the revenue they actually pull in across.the entire company

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve said this for years.

        The bullshit justification for these cockroach companies is always about fiduciary responsibility to shareholders.

        Shareholders need to start suing these companies for failing their fiduciary responsibilities by allowing strikes like this. The strikes are never surprising. They’re always obvious and the result is as well. All it does is cost millions/billions of dollars and is completely avoidable. How that doesn’t inherently fail the fiduciary responsibility is baffling to me.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to the Seoul Economic Daily, daily losses could approach 3 trillion won ($2 billion) if fabrication lines are paused entirely. Professor Kwon Seok-joon at Sungkyunkwan University previously estimated that the 18-day walkout alone would cause 10 trillion to 17 trillion won ($17 billion) in direct losses, while JPMorgan has projected total losses of up to 43 trillion won ($28 billion) when factoring in labor costs and extended production disruption.

    Wow. What a huge amount of money to lose just because you won’t pay your highly skilled workers more.

    As @osanna@lemmy.vg said, you really have to wonder how much it would cost Samsung to pay their workers more if they’re willing to tank a potentially $20-40 billion loss instead of giving the union what they’re asking for.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Probably - because the amount of money they’re about to lose was probably less than what actually negotiating with the union would’ve cost them

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          How many people do your think they employ? Because I performed seconds of painstaking research and came up with 80k, so I divided $40B by 80k employees and I get $500k/worker.

          They could afford to give everyone a 25k raise and it would be 20 years before it cost them a dime.

          That doesn’t seem like a smart business decision.

          • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            By that calculation, even on the lower end of only losing $20 billion that’d still be 10 years before it’d cost them anymore than this rancid business decision did.

            They’re so determined to not negotiate with the union that they’d rather throw away the shareholder’s money than give it to workers… And that’s just this scheduled strike. If talks fail again, I bet you there will be more to come.

            Samsung might have a difficult time explaining that one at their shareholder presentation next year.

  • Jimbo@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wild that when it comes to a strike, it’s always cheaper to just concede and companies never do. Ever.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not cheaper in the long term always. Unfortunately it might still be cheaper for them to let it ride out.

  • bunlee@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wow so what does this mean for foxconn? Will they rise in chip manufacturing? This is gonna probably change regions of better chip makers as foxconn was the lead in the market. Now apple is working on a ai chip for their next release. Not good Samsung as you were the lead for new better chips I wonder where you gonna go for the next chip manufacturing.