• floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I would. They’re making an entirely unoriginal product with an entirely unoriginal sales pitch and, presumably, an unoriginal surveillance-based business model.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is it really unoriginal? If it is patentable then it is as original as one can get in an already very developed technological market. I’m not saying I want this out there, but that doesn’t mean that what they are doing is wholly unoriginal, especially if no one has done it before.

        • bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          The only difference between their concept and Alexa, for example, is that you wear it on your face and tether it to a phone. Oh, I guess it also has a display you can read. Massive innovation right there.

          • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think the facial recognition bit of it is what makes it novel.

            Under your argument the smartphone was not an innovation, it’s just a computer you carry in your pocket. And actually computers are not an innovation they are just calculators that can make a lot more calculations at one time.

            It’s kind of disingenuous.