• Raoul Duke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Eh, I got 40% on 2 tries. It’s something I guess. Either way, why not take the higher quality version if it’s included?

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So quite literally worse than a coin flip, then.

      Streaming lossless audio will use up three to six times as much data, along with the higher processing demands to play them back, so there’s always a penalty involved. We didn’t invent codecs for no reason.

    • Damarus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So in other words you may as well have guessed randomly and gotten the same result. I’m against lossless streaming because my bandwidth is a limited resource and it will take longer to load the same track with higher bitrate. As there is no audible difference, there is also no practical reason to choose it.