• muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Somehow we had second life before Roblox and as bad as some places there got it still was never as awful as Roblox.

    • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I imagine it’s because Second Life was never popular with children.

      As bad as mostly-adult spaces can be, the worst kinds of humans seem to skitter around children’s spaces.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Something about the density of innocent and helpless prey really appeals to people who like to prey on the helpless and innocent.

  • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Its kinda sad, a child has just died, and some big corpo is right now would be thinking how they can use this as a way to extract more data out of everyone in order to make profits.

  • Preventer79@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Grooming allegations notwithstanding, Roblox itself reminds me of those generic games you’d see a character playing in some TV show.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Roblox does not seem to care what they do as long as it makes money. This seems like a huge problem.

    Discord on the other hand… I honestly don’t care if they go out of business, I really don’t like that platform. But how did they have any responsibility in this matter?

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It argues that if Roblox and Discord had taken steps to screen users before allowing them on apps, or implemented age and identity verification and other safety measures, “Ethan would have never interacted with this predator, never suffered the harm that he did, and never died by suicide.”

      They want these sites to screen every users ID on sign up. I’m sure the courts will love another, “for the children” security bill.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Why? It’s idiotic to force age verification and an ID to play games on the internet, and I’m assuming the kid didn’t just click a button to turn off parental controls. He probably got his parents to do it. Liability shouldn’t be pushed off to others every time something bad happens. This is the groomers fault. Not a game company or an internet provider or anyone else. Hell; why not sue Intel for making a processor that allowed the game to be played and discord to be used? Do you also expect every startup game company and Indy dev to have millions of dollars worth of chat security and oversight? Shit like this is nothing but a money grab.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Roblox said it is designed with “rigorous built in safety features” and is “continually innovating new safety features — over 100 this year alone — that protect our users and empower parents and caregivers with greater control and visibility.”

    The fact that they are framing it in this manner “100 features in this year alone” (what does this even mean?) suggests that they don’t care.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you could pump out 100 features in 1 year, how little were they doing before??

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The parental options don’t do a fucking thing. The game’s predatory by design (in every meaning of the word)…

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I couldn’t even name a hundred safety features. Ten would be enough. Age gate, parental controls, moderators, a report function… What more does it need?

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “No one in the history of games has cared this much!”

      But now they know blatant bullshit lies generally work pretty well on our population so expect more of this crap.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I don’t think screening is the answer, but with Roblox and Discord, the follow-up on reports of predators is lacking and should be punished severely by the courts. I don’t care if your profits go down a percentage point or two, you need to improve your product.

  • skribe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sadly, the first thing the defending lawyers will point out is where were the parents in all this? Why was he able to turn off the parental controls, and why didn’t the parents notice?

    • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      21 hours ago

      "Roblox allowed Ethan to turn off the parental controls "

      If true, this is very damning for Roblox.

      Parents can’t be everywhere all the time checking what they already set up, that’s unrealistic.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Maybe the first thing is that it’s just the predators fault and anything beyond that is bullshit. Gonna sue the company that made the PC too? Maybe the electric company for providing the electricity to it?

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is like suing the phone company over phone calls. Sorry but the man involved was responsible, not the communication mediums.

    • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s a difference between

      “A pedophile committed a crime in my house (but I had nothing to do with it).”

      and

      “Gee, the pedophiles seem to think my house is a great place to do crime, because they keep doing it, but that’s none of my business.”

  • obey@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think it would be great if all end to end encryption would be intercepted by the government organisations and all chats would be monitored with AI and if needed action taken by humans.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The real cause of the suicide is when he realized he was going to work 40 hours every week for the rest of his life. They are saying it is “an unnamed arrested man” that did it, but this is hogwash and only an excuse to implant authoritarian identity collection of everyone on the internet so that the secret police can exterminate all persons with ideology counter to that of the regime.

      That said, if Roblox and Discord were deleted from existence that would be A-OK with me spit fuck those guys !

  • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I doubt it’ll go anywhere, and I’m not sure it should.

    Do we want tougher moderation on social media? Does social media need to be policed?

    Most social networks have report tools. They also have blocks.

    If someone is rude to you online — honestly, happens all the time. People have a bad day or whatever. I’ve said something, not even meaning to, that set someone off and they’ve stalked me across communities. Even in the last few weeks I’ve been on Lemmy. But, if someone is consistently negative toward you, you can block them. You can also ignore them. You could even call them out on their bullshit and then ignore them, and that’s what I did. Maybe it wasn’t the best course of action, this guy’s probably got a girlfriend or maybe a kid he’s beating up when he doesn’t get his way with people online. But I have no control over that. What I do have control over is how I feel when people talk to me any kind of way. The way they act could be because of any number of things. The way they were raised, the way they’ve been treated, maybe they burned their hand cooking and they’re just mad at the world right this second and they say something rude. I got no control over any of that whatsoever. What I do have control over is how their words make me feel and how I react.

    Maybe that’s something kids can’t just pick up, but maybe it’s something they should learn. Bullies aren’t going to go away. People aren’t going to stop having bad days. But if they’re taking it out on people through social media, they aren’t a physical threat to you — they can be safely ignored.

    Adding a bunch of extra moderators and safety features and all that won’t change things. It won’t make people behave better. We can’t make them do that. We can try. Maybe AI can be used to detect hostile posts and tell people they can’t use the network for an hour, tell them to go touch grass or something… but they’ll just hop on over to another network and do the same shit there. And there will be so many false positives. So I think we should just ignore hostility. On something like this, you can downvote it. If it’s the same person, the network may even show you that you’ve downvoted this person multiple times, and you can then decide to block them. But maybe they’re helping someone in another community. Block them and move on. It’s faster and it works better.

    • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, I think there’s more that platforms can do to help but I don’t think age verification or reading messages is it either.

      What really annoys me is how people will go… Parents should parent… But then nobody is helping them figure out the best way to parent a child on apps. How are they supposed to know what to do? They’re probably not on Roblox themselves, don’t know anyone who is, don’t understand it, don’t know how best to talk about it with their kid, etc. Parental controls are great but not enough, parents need help to do the best thing. They aren’t all knowing and this shit is changing all the time.

      I think it’s the responsibility of parents to parent but it’s also the duty of the company to help them understand their product and how best to help their kid and it’s the duty of us all to look out for the most vulnerable in society.