schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoChat Control is "like a malware on your device" – Signal slams the EU proposal to scan your private chatswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1439arrow-down12
arrow-up1437arrow-down1external-linkChat Control is "like a malware on your device" – Signal slams the EU proposal to scan your private chatswww.techradar.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·12 days agoI don’t think you can block YouTube channels via DNS.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 days agoinsert joke about the OSI model
minus-squareGreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agoAre you stupid? There’s no layer… …oh I see.
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 days agoYes, I’d rather call it the Ötzi model
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-211 days agoDNS should allow us to create a blacklist of sites, it would avoid to trash our phone CPU for some useless antivirus, family link (and I guess other MDM) is already enough. If not the DNS, then family link itself.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 days agoBut a YouTube “channel” is an application/service specific concept, not exposed in any way dns would be aware of.
I don’t think you can block YouTube channels via DNS.
insert joke about the OSI model
Definitely a layer 8 problem
Are you stupid? There’s no layer…
…oh I see.
Yes, I’d rather call it the Ötzi model
DNS should allow us to create a blacklist of sites, it would avoid to trash our phone CPU for some useless antivirus, family link (and I guess other MDM) is already enough. If not the DNS, then family link itself.
But a YouTube “channel” is an application/service specific concept, not exposed in any way dns would be aware of.