Look up elsewhere about the reputation Brother has with compatibility. Personal experience: never fails. That’s their jam.

Trust me. It is.

This has more details: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeKeyring/SecurityFAQ

The security model skews towards convenience versus absolute security, meaning automation is it’s goal, not perfect security. They use a reasonable amount of security to protect unauthorized access, meaning untrusted apps can’t access keys by default, and container apps only have selective access. AppArmor is supposed to be handling some DBUS interactions in the background to prevent any old app from grabbing everything, but again, automation is the purpose here.

If you don’t have a reasonably trusted system, then sure, it’s about as secure as any other password manager. I remember reading some time ago there was a plan to make a global framework for trusted application.accessnto things like this, but it was shot down for being “oppressive” in the same way as Microsoft’s trust app mess.

Ideally there would be an advanced mode where each app is granted access to specific keys, and that interaction is controlled by the user. This would never be the default obviously as the user interaction would be an insane annoyance to people who don’t care.

It’s enough to build a pattern match and scan against it being elsewhere. Surely they did at least much to find all these packages with malware.

They should have some sort of static code scanners on the repos at rest at this point that look for certain patterns and issue warnings.

Hilarious

Just install Asahi or Fedora and get your speed back.

M1&2 are pretty much fully implemented in Asahi.

Good thing almost all flavors of Linux run flawlessly on the x86 models.

Is this a bot? These can’t be real responses…

The currently existing infrastructure for standard datacenters with normal capacity for heating and cooling are just fine for basic compute and storage.

All the new outfits builds are being built very specifically for inference compute, which they are only doing because it’s less hassle than retrofitting existing facilities, and they think they can trick/screw taxpayers into footing the bill if new facilities are built.

It’s a scam from top to bottom.

Ban all new datacenters as fast as possible and shut this shit DOWN

No gaming distro outperforms any other distro by any measurable means a user would notice.

5G was mostly about cramming more connections into the spectrum and expanding broadcast range (as well as some other things), but it wasn’t just about node speed on the network.

If you ever need more reasons to avoid Ubuntu…

Or set fire to delicate fabrics, wallpaper, or other potentially flammable surfaces a mosquito might be near or on.

I don’t think it could possibly be measured because it’s something like: (file size ÷ block size) * num_writes

So it entire depends on the types of files, how often you’re utilizing writes to disk…etc. I just wouldn’t worry about it. If you REALLY want to estimate the tax: use iostat to check the number of writes on the drive in the last 24 hours, THEN enable online defrag and check it again in 24 hours. See what the difference is.

It really doesn’t matter for HDD though. Barely probably matters for SSD.

It should be a default, but I can see why it would be disabled for SSDs to prevent using cycles unnecessarily. If you’re using HDDs, check and see if it’s enabled.

Either way, unless you’re REALLY needing some minor performance improvements out of your disks, it shouldn’t make a huge difference.

Oops, you’re right. ZFS doesn’t have that.