Delta has a long-term strategy to boost its profitability by moving away from set fares and toward individualized pricing using AI. The pilot program, which uses AI for 3% of fares, has so far been “amazingly favorable,” the airline said. Privacy advocates fear this will lead to price-gouging, with one consumer advocate comparing the tactic to “hacking our brains.”

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    But AI allows us to turn talentless hacks into “artists”! How on earth can such a blessing be used for bad!!

    Woe to all of us!

    (obligatory s/)

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    This is already how it has worked forever and AI was not needed. Try it yourself using different devices or times of day.

  • BlessedDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Thank god for GDPR. We Europeans, according to GDPR article 22, have a right to object to automated decision making without having service denied.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Oh good. Then it will know I’m too broke to fly.

    ETA The real joy will be when someone charts prices and notices nonwhites are disproportionately overcharged, for which Delta will be responsible during the class action lawsuit.

    And saying but the algo / AI did it will be as useful as saying but that’s the fault of our sales people who get commissions.

    • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That was my first thought. Even if the system does not know people’s protected class status, does not mean it cannot discriminate against them.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve recently been looking at how Facebook’s advertising algorithm works, and it is a piece of pure fucking “the AI did it not us” evil. It can seek out all types of vulnerable people and target them on stuff that if a human salesperson did it you’d call them a sociopath.

        Anorexic? Body confidence issues? Financial problems? Signs of susceptibility to fascist messaging? Here’s some paid messages from people who want your dollar. Seriously that whole place needs shutting down, it’s the worst thing to happen to humanity in recent history.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        finally a decent reason to lose weight. longer life? pfft? have you seen this shit? and there’s no amount of weight I can lose to look better lol.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I minimize air travel to the extent possible. Unfortunately I have non-local family so unless I choose to just not see them my choices are a bit limited.

      But yeah, I don’t fly for tourism or leisure.

      • Tire@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This is AMERICA we have the FREEDOM to pick one of 2 -3 companies that will take advantage of us and keep us in poverty 🦅

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are SUPPOSED to be laws against it … but will they enforce them?

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They left it until the very end of the article:

      Early research on personalized pricing isn’t favorable for the consumer. Consumer Watchdog found that the best deals were offered to the wealthiest customers—with the worst deals given to the poorest people, who are least likely to have other options.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah when I started travelling on a generous business expense account I found that it was increasingly the case that I didn’t even need to charge things to it. Things just start becoming fucking free when you’ve got money.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is honestly surprising to me. Wouldn’t they charge wealthy people more because they could just suck up the higher prices?

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Charge most more and a few the same. I doubt anyone will be getting charged less.

      • multifariace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        On the rare occasion I fly, I know I can get my long knees in a Delta plus seat. This restriction will definitely make my ticket go up with such an AI. It feels like it should be an accomodation but is more often a punishment.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No but I’m sure it will be informed by Facebook when your best friend dies and when the funeral will be so that flight will cost twice as much.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If that’s all it was, it wouldn’t be bad. Unfortunately the reason they want to use ai is because it will be more complicated than that. Think - you need to fly somewhere vs you are thinking of flying somewhere. Data brokers will provide the ai with information about your job, your (and your family’s) health, funerals, etc.

      • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t quite understand if your statement is for or against consumer protections because I can’t fathom being against consumer protections. Could you please clarify?

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        thats a dishonest argument. One has a money assembly line straight to a billionaire’s house. The other’s assembly line that has a possibility to be used for public good.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Making sure you pay the absolute most possible for everything you buy. Welcome to tyranny capitalism. You will be charged a poor tax in the form of optimised pricing exploitation.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Econ 101 also states that a failed business stops existing. In reality, failed businesses are endlessly bailed out as “too big to fail” and they pay their executives bonuses with that bailout money while continuing to rip off customers along with the other one or two companies in the same industry that do the same.