Soon after I joined Lemmy a few years ago, I searched for communities based on my interests and subscribed to the ones with the highest numbers of users to ensure they are active. Sometimes I joined multiple, but then saw that some people post the same thing to more than one, cluttering my feed, so I left the smaller ones.

It’s only after my community ban from !games@hexbear.net for disagreeing about Ukraine that I was told about MeanwhileOnGrad, learning exactly what “the tankie triad” means and why big Lemmy instances have defederated from those. Lemmy.ml, where the ML probably stands for Marxist-Leninist, seems to have been defederated by fewer, possibly because it’s run by the creator of Lemmy, Dessalines. Nevertheless, there is evidence of Dessalines holding the same authoritarian communist views as the rest.

Recently, there were two posts on !privacy@lemmy.ml about Signal, but then in both cases, admin davel (who is known on MoG for seeing CIA’s hand in running Ukraine, among other things) and Dessalines linked (1, 2, 3) the same article by Dessalines, which not only argues Signal could be a CIA honeypot (as if it matters when proper e2ee is used), but also manages to shoehorn China even into that, claiming its government “prefers autonomy”. This sort of portrayal of totalitarianism as sovereignty is the reason I unsubscribed from the community. As it has been said by others, ML is not a neutral instance but a means of pushing authoritarian views onto unsuspecting users.

Edit: Made the post title clearer.

  • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes hello, I would like to learn more about privacy.

    But don’t tell me about threats to my privacy unless I already know about them.

    I don’t want to change my mental model of the world, I already know everything important.

    • Rose@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because praise for China is to improve privacy? Is that a religious thing?

      • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You post a lot about anti-communist material in a community about hating communists than fascists. Privacy is more important for the people the state dislikes, like anarchists and communists and socialists. Not those who the state benefits from, like hard-line anti-communists.

        They get work for free from you, while you run away from the people who establish open source methods of communication to avoid the fascist puritanical states, that you seemingly prefer.

        • Rose@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          One post about authoritarian communists isn’t a lot. The states those people praise only curb efforts to stay private. A common feature of totalitarianism is that it wants to control even people’s private lives. Funnily, as I note in a different comment citing a blog linked by davel and others, the US, as authoritarian and fascist as it’s getting, has funded great open source tools and protocols like Wireguard and Tor. Meanwhile the likes of Russia block them altogether, while the likes of China and Iran crack down even more.