• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    There’s no option. Transitioning to nuclear will keep you burning stuff for 10-15 years whilst they’re built. Even SMRs will be 5-10. Renewables come online with a much smoother transition curve. You reduce burning stuff sooner, and we need whatever is quickest.

    • Kanda@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Still need batteries big enough to power global shipping etc. Nuclear can do that, even though building reactors takes time

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It can, and I’m not anti-nuclear for all use cases. I just don’t think it stops us burning stuff soon enough.

        • Kanda@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No perfect solution, sadly. We’re also very late to start reducing emissions. And humanity doesn’t seem to be able to get their shit together and actually do something about it any time soon