• Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The population?

    It stops public praying as a virtue. When praying is only done in private you can’t judge people being a worse Christian etc for not participating.

    So you’ll have a more secular society with more room for people to practice their religion as they see fit. Not doing things just because it’s expected of you.

    Like if there’s prayer room at a school. More people will use it because they don’t want to be seen as a bad Muslim. Even if they wouldn’t normally pray at those times.

    It creates pressures and expectations.

    • BananaLama@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Peer pressure will exist regardless though. This provides as space for people to pray in private.

      Why not make the prayer rooms individual rooms? Would that not solve the edge case you describe?

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        There is no logic to this person’s stance, they just want to do harm to the other. They wrap that in a veil of impartial rational reasoning to quell the cognitive dissonance.

        If this law was phrased as anti-loitering to keep homeless people off sidewalks or banning private rooms for nursing mothers they would be up in arms. It’s functionally the same, but since it targets their preferred adversary they nod in approval.