• tubthumper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    Has someone made an SCP entry for these guys yet? Akin to the one they made for that one IKEA but even more meta somehow?

    I’d like to see how this story ends.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yawn, we all know how this goes. So what model am I not supposed to use? I’ll be sure and avoid it, though I’d much rather avoid downloading their leaked weights like I avoid other things I’m not supposed to download.

    • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s hard to keep track of all the things I’m not supposed to download. That’s why I have a NAS. I get a sense of fulfillment from seeing those empty, empty drives that can’t be used by anyone else to download things they shouldn’t.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    ffs

    “My name is Claude, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”

    • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      It may have blurted out something like “hey I know exactly how to end this economic suffering and all diseases globaly ! Its easy you just need to…”

      Quick Hit the Red Button!!! Shut it OFF!!!

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Translation: It is good at finding bugs that the NSA doesn’t want people to know about.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Man, I’ll start telling that to my boss whenever I miss a deadline. “Sorry boss, the code I made is too powerful, we can’t release it”

  • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 hours ago

    crazy that the AI companies big selling point is always “our new model is TOO POWERFUL, it’s gone rampant and learned at a geometric rate, it enslaved six interns in the punishment sphere and subjected them to a trillion subjective years of torment. please invest, buy our stock”

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How would it do that?

      It’s a set of inputs that generates and output, once per execution. Integrating it into an infrastructure that allows it to start external programs and scheduling really isn’t on the LLM.

      You cannot start a timer without having a timer, too. And LLMs aren’t brings who exist continually like you and me so time exists on a different, foreign dimension to an LLM.

      • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You attach an epoch timestamp to the initial message and then you see how much time has passed since then. Does this sound like rocket surgery?

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          How does the LLM check the timestamps without a prompt? By continually prompting? In which case, you are the timer.

          • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s running in memory… I’m not going to explain it, just ask an AI if it exists when you don’t prompt it

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s not how that works.

              LLMs execute on request. They tend not to be scheduled to evaluate once in a while since that would be crazy wasteful.

              • stringere@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Edit to add: I know I’m not replying to the bad mansplainer.

                LLM != TSR

                Do people even use TSR as a phrase anymore? I don’t really see it in use much, probably because it’s more the norm than exception in modern computing.

                TSR = old techy speak, Terminate and Stay Resident. Back when RAM was more limited (hey and maybe again soon with these prices!) programs were often run once and done, they ran and were flushed from RAM. Anything that needed to continue running in the background was a TSR.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Remember when Scam Altman posted a picture of the Death Star to explain how scary GPT5 is? lmao these people are all such cretins and I hate them to the last.