• SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You are making assertions based on your expectations about geopolitics? But your reasoning ignores history and Russian known tactics. Not convinced.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t think it does ignore that. I would say there’s almost a style, like a calling card of different nations ability to create subterfuge. Russia and China are both heavily involved in this globally. But they have very different approaches. Russia is invested in America. China in Canada. Historically this is accurate. Geopolitical this is also accurate.