• jcorvera@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    You know, if we were taught to use something like LaTeX, this wouldn’t be an issue because of BEAMER

  • PortNull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    And Accenture itself reportedly started requiring senior staff to start using AI or risk losing out on promotions.

    Every time companies urge employees to use AI and then regret the cost. The fuck is wrong with people? Why are they pushing it so hard? Does Sam give them hand jobs if they use the most?

    I don’t understand this need to pressure staff into using something and threatening punishment if not. Are they worried that their employees are not efficient enough? Pay them the token prices on top of their salary and see how stuff changes.

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      The fuck is wrong with people?

      That’s the corporate hive mind, all afraid of missing out of a great productivity tool. And they think that because media these days just copies what the richest people say and hype it up because the rich these days only speak to yes-men.

      and then regret the cost

      Reality doesn’t need to obey yes-men.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      This is actually very common across businesses. My company actually has our bonuses tied to AI adoption, so we have dashboards showing people’s AI usage. Other major companies have done the same, which lead to the practice of “token maxxing” where people were using AI to make more AI calls to boost their numbers up.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Consulting giant Accenture is trying to figure out how to stop non-technical workers from blowing through companies’ AI token budget on trivial tasks like converting PDFs to presentation slides

    Sounds the people they hired to do the shit work don’t actually want to do that type of work. I, for one, am shocked. Shocked I tell you!

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      True except the 80% of people who will suffer further because of it, and the 20% that will gleefully be laughing to the bank and buy up everything at a discounted price. Few of us should be cheering for the failure or success of AI.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The problem seems to be that it takes competent employees to get anything useful out of an LLM in the first place. However, it is these very employees whom the greedy CEOs want to replace. So the result is that an incredible amount of money is being spent on absolutely nothing.

    The logical conclusion, then, should be that it would make more sense to replace these useless CEOs with AI. Since they’re just making idiotic decisions for a lot of money anyway, there could be lots of savings.

    Unfortunately, however, that will never happen, because contrary to all that talk of KPIs and such, what really matters in the upper echelons of management is never efficiency, but rather ruthlessness and brown-nosing.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Indeed!

        “The bubble doesn’t want cheap useful things,” Doctorow said. “It wants expensive ‘disruptive’ things: big foundational models that lose billions of dollars every year. When the AI investment mania halts, most of the models are going to disappear, because it just won’t be economical to keep the data centers running. The collapse of the AI bubble is going to be ugly. Seven AI companies currently account for more than a third of the stock market, and they endlessly pass around the same $100 billion IOU. AI is the asbestos in the walls of our technological society, stuffed with wild abandon by a finance sector and tech monopolists run amok. We will be excavating it for a generation or more.”

        I think that pretty much sums it up.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 minutes ago

    converting pdfs to presentation

    I don’t get this, We’ve had OCR for a while. All around San Francisco Ive been seeing ads for “llamaparse” with the tagline “we parse pdfs”, like is that all you do? How do you afford this marketing budget?

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      PDFs are so shitty to work with, it’s like translating them, it’s impossible without using a tool like Google translate.

      I fucking hate PDFs as much as I hate Adobe.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I HATE PDFS TOO. I hate them! 99.999% of the time I’m given a PDF file it would be more useful as an HTML file.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    AI is about to join the list of “stupid technologies that people should really wait and see before investing on”, which includes

    • 3D TVs - complete dud
    • Blockchain - useless for real world problems already solved by typical computing
    • Metaverse - still one of the best jokes around
    • Folding screen phones - overpriced junk
    • Fully autonomous self driving cars - “Just around the corner” for the past 10 years
    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Folding Phones Sales Continue To Increase since 2019, showing people seem to like them

      • glarf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Two time buyer, can confirm. They’re legitimately useful and durable enough for me.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Two time buyer as in you liked it so much and bought another, or two time buyer as in the first is already inoperative and got another?

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think they are for me but I honestly would not include them in that list above. First of all, there is no investment bubble around them and secondly some people seem to like them and are ready to pay for them. They also do have legitimate benefits (but also downsides)

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yeah I didn’t dislike the 3d monitors/tvs they just had too many caveats at the time and VR kind of ate its lunch.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              60 minutes ago

              3D stuff has the fundamental issue that VR and 3D views are just incredibly straining on the human user. Folding phones have no such issue and their durability is also good enough to be competitive (yet clearly worse than regular smart phones). They are really not comparable to 3D monitors and VR.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This could also be explained by the entire rest of the market being different flavors of the exact same thing. A little over a decade ago, we actually had choices in what type of phone we wanted. Now, if you want anything other than an identical slab, foldables are your only choice.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Disco Stu says disco record sales have trended upwards for the entire decade of 1970’s. If this trend continues… eyyyyyyyyy!

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Some of these turned out to be useless, some just haven’t been adequately delivered yet.

      In 2040 folding phones and autonomous cars might be great, but blockchain will still be a solution in search of a problem.

      • FirmDistribution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hyper Loop was an insane idea (in a bad way).

        Motherfucker wanted to invent subway, but for cars, making cities even more dependent of cars.

        • flyingSock@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 hours ago

          hyperloop was very low air pressure subway tubes for high speed trains. Works for research tesring tracks impractical to infeasible for real world applications. But it apparently what killed high speed rail in california (because wait this will be better)

          The cars in tubes thing was a seperate stupid idea.

        • officermike@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t know that he really wanted to fully execute on Hyperloop so much as build hype (and Tesla stock price) around the idea while sabotaging funding for California’s high speed rail project. But yes, end goal to keep people buying his cars.

      • encelado748@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Cold fusion is a scam, not a bad idea. There is no scientific basis for that. Is as bad as “infinite energy engine”.

          • encelado748@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Green hydrogen is water electrolysis with solar power, not scam, it works, it is just a question of making it economically viable. Hyperloop is just stupid, but within the realm of possible. Cold fusion is the only scam here.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Metaverse - still one of the best jokes around

      This one I slightly disagree with. I got my headset on a black friday and it was super cheap, but VR documentaries are friggin’ amazing and I hope museums will invest heavily in it in the coming years.

      Fully autonomous self driving cars - “Just around the corner” for the past 10 years

      Definitely. Makes me feel good for people who make their living driving trucks.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        The metaverse isn’t VR in general, it was meant to be a virtual space in VR where users could be advertised to and buy/rent things and space like in a physical city.

        It failed because those were the intended starting points, and it didn’t solve any problem other than a shitty attempt at a “I want to live in a ready player one world” and didn’t have any compelling reasons to actually use it, let alone use it and pay ridiculous amounts to do interesting things there. They always just wanted to be the middlemen, offering space for others to pay for and do something interesting in. The most interesting thing they came up with is having a meeting with avatars instead of faces on a screen (and most people don’t even want to turn on their video and just do a voice conversation instead).

  • Hnery@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    that came after Uber told employees to use AI as much as possible and Uber’s CTO said the company had blown its entire AI budget in four months

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Further evidence that most CEO’s and SLT’s are just confident, lucky, and born wealthy; not competent, smarter, or much better than average.

  • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can’t read the whole article bc paywall… But if they are really worried about token cost for converting PDF to a Powerpoint, they ain’t seen nothing yet. Agentic coding the way AI companies push it (multiple agents in parallel with Claude, looping etc) uses way way wayyyyy more tokens than this.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        How do you use it without agents? Just prompt the chat interface?

        When I used claude code, I’d go through the smallest tier subscriptions 5h limit in half an hour sometimes if I used Opus lol, reckon at API pricing it would’ve been 100 bucks an hour

        • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Chat prompts and then accept the changes when they are worth using. LLMs are entropy apparatuses, injecting that shit straight into your code base is crazy. It took one module/subsystem done with agents for me to realize that it was completely unmaintainable. Not a single eng can make a change to it and the only option is to rewrite. So I banned agents. I know some people still try to get away with that style of LLM coding but I encourage people to instant deny a PR if it looks like garbage.

            • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              Agent mode is disabled, only chat mode works. This is with GitHub Copilot harness in JetBrains Rider or Visual Studio Pro. Agentic coding means it can make decisions without a human.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Leadership are mostly idiots. They don’t know how work gets done. They think like “wow it produced so many lines of code!” and don’t know that’s not a useful metric.

    My job had Microsoft do a four hour copilot demo for the entire team last week. (Surely an immense expense. They won’t pay for most people to be full time with benefits). The guy used copilot to make a regex to parse html. A little surprised zalgo didn’t show up.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ll one up you.

      Google’s “principal evangelist” for Gemini did a 2hr presentation for almost 1,000 people at my company on Google Meet a few weeks ago.

      40 mins late due to nobody knowing how to get more than 500 people in a meet.

      He then spent 90 minutes showing everyone how to do shit that literally everyone knows how to do with AI nowadays; touch up old photos of your grandparents, make shitty marketing mascots and logos, etc…

      Here’s an image I took during the presentation. For a laugh, look at the background text:

      A C-Suite exec got impatient and asked when we were going to cover how to use agentic tools and he said “oh I’ve got a little section at the end for that.” Ffs

      Literally nothing useful happened during this meeting and nearly 1,000 employees were idle for no reason. A complete and utter waste of fucking time. Gemini dude didn’t even bother to consider what use cases we might be looking into, he just did a boilerplate ELI5 of AI that would have been outdated in like 2022.

      Absolutely insane.

      • Thales@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Never work with children or animals (or do a live demo)

        ROFL. Thanks for the screencap, that’s priceless.

        Lastly, poor Buc-ee the beaver deserves better.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      CEOs them to make power points using the already pre built company presentation template then talk about how they couldn’t have made it without AI like that’s supposed to show how useful AI is and not how incompetent they are

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeh but the people trained ‘number’ widget went up on their numbers dashboard. Good reason for another self awarded bonus!